Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Manoj Sah Vs. the State of Bihar

Manoj Sah vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 19, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/975242

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Manoj Sah

Advocate Mr. Deepak Ranjan

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

patna high court cr.misc. no.946 of 2012 (2) dt.19-01-2012 in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.946 of 2012 ====================================================== manoj sah .... .... petitioner. versus the state of bihar .... .... opposite party. ====================================================== coram: honourable mr. justice dinesh kumar singh oral order (per: honourable mr. justice dinesh kumar singh”19. 01-2012 heard mr. deepak ranjan, learned counsel for the petitioner and mr. umanath mishra, learned a.p.p. for the state. the petitioner being the husband is languishing in custody since 20.09.2011 in a case registered for the offence under section 304b of the i.p.c. the accusation is of killing the wife for non-fulfillment of dowry demand within five years of marriage. this is admitted by the informant that the petitioner also received 35% burnt injury. it is submitted by learned counsel for the informant that the petitioner received burnt injury in the back since his wife tried to catch him when he was running away from the place of occurrence whereas it is contended by learned counsel for the patna high court cr.misc. no.946 of 2012 (2) dt.19-01-2012 petitioner that when the victim caught fire the petitioner was looking for blanket to save her when she caught the petitioner. considering the fact that the petitioner also received 35% burnt injury and death has taken place after five years of marriage, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned s.d.j.m., pupri at sitamarhi in connection with sursand p.s. case no. 152 of 2010. learned court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner if the petitioner defaults for three consecutive occasions during trial. (dinesh kumar singh, j) u. k.

Full Judgment

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.946 of 2012 (2) dt.19-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.946 of 2012 ====================================================== Manoj Sah .... .... Petitioner. Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH”

19. 01-2012 Heard Mr. Deepak Ranjan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Umanath Mishra, learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner being the husband is languishing in custody since 20.09.2011 in a case registered for the offence under Section 304B of the I.P.C. The accusation is of killing the wife for non-fulfillment of dowry demand within five years of marriage. This is admitted by the informant that the petitioner also received 35% burnt injury. It is submitted by learned counsel for the informant that the petitioner received burnt injury in the back since his wife tried to catch him when he was running away from the place of occurrence whereas it is contended by learned counsel for the Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.946 of 2012 (2) dt.19-01-2012 petitioner that when the victim caught fire the petitioner was looking for blanket to save her when she caught the petitioner. Considering the fact that the petitioner also received 35% burnt injury and death has taken place after five years of marriage, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Pupri at Sitamarhi in connection with Sursand P.S. Case No. 152 of 2010. Learned court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner if the petitioner defaults for three consecutive occasions during trial. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) U. K.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial