Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Arbind Kumar @ Arbind Yadav @ Arbind Kumar Yadav Vs. the State of Bihar

Arbind Kumar @ Arbind Yadav @ Arbind Kumar Yadav vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 19, 2012
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/975236

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Arbind Kumar @ Arbind Yadav @ Arbind Kumar Yadav

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

patna high court cr.misc. no.30809 of 2011 (3) dt.19-01-2012 in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no. 30809 of 2011 ====================================================== 1. arbind kumar @ arbind yadav @ arbind kumar yadav s/o chedi prasad yadav r/o vill. maugama, p.s. shankarpur, distt. madhepura .... .... petitioner/s versus 1. the state of bihar .... .... opposite party/s ====================================================== appearance : for the petitioner/s : mr.suresh kumar, adv. for the opposite party/s : dr. indiwar kumari, app. ====================================================== coram: honourable justice smt. anjana prakash oral order (per: honourable justice smt. anjana prakash) 03. 19.01.2012 heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the state. the petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under sections 467, 468, 420, 414 and 471 of the indian penal code. considering that the case is of the year 2002 and cognizance was taken in the matter in the year 2009 whereas the present application has been filed only in the year 2011, i am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. the prayer for bail is rejected. (anjana prakash, j.) vikash/-

Full Judgment

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.30809 of 2011 (3) dt.19-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No. 30809 of 2011 ====================================================== 1. Arbind Kumar @ Arbind Yadav @ Arbind Kumar Yadav S/O Chedi Prasad Yadav R/O Vill. Maugama, P.S. Shankarpur, Distt. Madhepura .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Suresh Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Dr. Indiwar Kumari, APP. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH) 03. 19.01.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 467, 468, 420, 414 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that the case is of the year 2002 and cognizance was taken in the matter in the year 2009 whereas the present application has been filed only in the year 2011, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail is rejected. (Anjana Prakash, J.) Vikash/-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial