Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Dilip Yadav Vs. the State of Bihar

Dilip Yadav vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 19, 2012
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/975235

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Dilip Yadav

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.1944 of 2012 dilip yadav versus the state of bihar ---------------------------------- 2/ 19.1.2012 heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the state. the petitioner is apprehending arrest in ara town p.s. case no. 324 of 2010 registered under sections 341, 323, 307, 379 and 504 of the indian penal code pending in the court of c.j.m. bhojpur at ara. it is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner was on police bail. in that view of the matter, anticipatory bail application is not maintainable. however, let the court below consider the prayer of the petitioner for regular bail in view of the ratio laid down in the case of mahendra prasad singh vs. the state of bihar reported in 2004(3) pljr 491 this application is disposed of with the aforesaid observation/direction. let this order be communicated to the learned court below through fax at the cost of the petitioner. anil/ (dinesh kumar singh, j.)

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1944 of 2012 Dilip Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 2/ 19.1.2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in Ara Town P.S. Case no. 324 of 2010 registered under sections 341, 323, 307, 379 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code pending in the court of C.J.M. Bhojpur at Ara. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner was on police bail. In that view of the matter, anticipatory bail application is not maintainable. However, let the court below consider the prayer of the petitioner for regular bail in view of the ratio laid down in the case of Mahendra Prasad Singh Vs. The State of Bihar reported in 2004(3) PLJR 491 This application is disposed of with the aforesaid observation/direction. Let this order be communicated to the learned court below through FAX at the cost of the petitioner. Anil/ (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial