MauladdIn Mian @ Md. MauladdIn Vs. the State of Bihar

MauladdIn Mian @ Md. Mauladdin vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 19, 2012

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/975210

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/975210
Court: Patna High Court
Decided On: May 19, 2012
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

MauladdIn Mian @ Md. Mauladdin

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.2488 of 2012 mauladdin mian @ md. mauladdin, son of late khalil mian, resident of village- jepura, p.s. panapur, district- saran. ..petitioner. versus the state of bihar..opposite party. ---------------------------------- 2.19. 01. 2012. heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the state. the petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with excise case no. 06/2009, registered under section 47 (a) of the excise act with regard to recovery of 275 litres of sprit from the dalan of the petitioner. learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is non-compliance of section 100 of cr.p.c. and sprit does not belong to the petitioner and he has been falsely implicated in this case. however, a major case has been lodged against the petitioner. having regard to the fact that 275 litres of sprit has been recovered from the dalan of the petitioner, hence i am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. hence his prayer of anticipatory bail is rejected. however, if the petitioner surrender and prayed for regular bail then the court below shall consider his prayer for bail on its own merit without being prejudiced by this order. m.p. ( gopal prasad, j.)

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.2488 of 2012 Mauladdin Mian @ Md. Mauladdin, son of Late Khalil Mian, Resident of Village- Jepura, P.S. Panapur, District- Saran. ..Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar..Opposite Party. ---------------------------------- 2.

19. 01. 2012. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Excise Case No. 06/2009, registered under Section 47 (a) of the Excise Act with regard to recovery of 275 litres of sprit from the Dalan of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is non-compliance of Section 100 of Cr.P.C. and sprit does not belong to the petitioner and he has been falsely implicated in this case. However, a major case has been lodged against the petitioner. Having regard to the fact that 275 litres of sprit has been recovered from the Dalan of the petitioner, hence I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Hence his prayer of anticipatory bail is rejected. However, if the petitioner surrender and prayed for regular bail then the court below shall consider his prayer for bail on its own merit without being prejudiced by this order. m.p. ( Gopal Prasad, J.)

Same Court & Year Patna · 2012 Same Parties MauladdIn Mian @ Md. Mauladdin vs The State of Bihar Same Subject Education