Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ex Parte Elmer Davis

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Mar-08-1943
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/97518

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
318 U.S. 412
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ex Parte Elmer Davis

Excerpt

ex parte elmer davis - 318 u.s. 412 (1943) u.s. supreme court ex parte elmer davis, 318 u.s. 412 (1943) ex parte elmer davis no. ___, original decided march 8, 1943 318 u.s. 412 on motion for leave to file petition for habeas corpus syllabus the applicant not having fully exhausted the remedies afforded by state appellate procedure, the application for leave to file a petition for habeas corpus in this case is denied without prejudice. leave denied. per curiam. after we denied, without prejudice, petitioner's previous application for leave to file in this court a petition for habeas corpus, 317 u.s. 592, the circuit court of vigo county, indiana, on december 29, 1942, sustained a demurrer to his petition for a writ of error coram nobis. petitioner now alleges that he has filed an appeal from that court to the supreme court of indiana. he also alleges that his request that a transcript of the coram nobis proceeding be furnished free of charge, because he is a poor person, has been denied. he contends that, in the absence of a transcript of the coram nobis proceeding, he is left without a remedy by appeal in the courts of indiana. but we cannot assume that the supreme court of indiana will refuse to use its process to bring before it such parts of the record as may be necessary for a decision of the case, or that, in that event, it will refuse to enter an order finally disposing of the appeal. until the supreme court of indiana has acted upon an application for an order finally disposing of the appeal -- which, if adverse to petitioner, he could make the subject of a petition for certiorari to this court -- the remedies afforded by state appellate procedure have not been fully exhausted. accordingly, we deny petitioner's present application without prejudice. application denied.

Full Judgment

Ex Parte Elmer Davis - 318 U.S. 412 (1943)
U.S. Supreme Court Ex Parte Elmer Davis, 318 U.S. 412 (1943)

Ex Parte Elmer Davis

No. ___, Original

Decided March 8, 1943

318 U.S. 412

ON MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE PETITION FOR HABEAS CORPUS

SYLLABUS

The applicant not having fully exhausted the remedies afforded by state appellate procedure, the application for leave to file a petition for habeas corpus in this case is denied without prejudice.

Leave denied.

PER CURIAM.

After we denied, without prejudice, petitioner's previous application for leave to file in this Court a petition for habeas corpus, 317 U.S. 592, the Circuit Court of Vigo County, Indiana, on December 29, 1942, sustained a demurrer to his petition for a writ of error coram nobis. Petitioner now alleges that he has filed an appeal from that court to the Supreme Court of Indiana. He also alleges that his request that a transcript of the coram nobis proceeding be furnished free of charge, because he is a poor person, has been denied. He contends that, in the absence of a transcript of the coram nobis proceeding, he is left without a remedy by appeal in the courts of Indiana. But we cannot assume that the Supreme Court of Indiana will refuse to use its process to bring before it such parts of the record as may be necessary for a decision of the case, or that, in that event, it will refuse to enter an order finally disposing of the appeal. Until the Supreme Court of Indiana has acted upon an application for an order finally disposing of the appeal -- which, if adverse to petitioner, he could make the subject of a petition for certiorari to this Court -- the remedies afforded by state appellate procedure have not been fully exhausted. Accordingly, we deny petitioner's present application without prejudice.

Application denied.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial