Ranjit Mahto Vs. the State of Bihar

Ranjit Mahto vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 11, 2012

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/975173

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/975173
Court: Patna High Court
Decided On: May 11, 2012
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ranjit Mahto

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.1527 of 2012 ranjit mahto son of bhadai mahto,resident of village gamaharia,p.s.raxaul, district east champaran versus the state of bihar ---------------------------------- for the petitioner : mr.anil kumar for the state : mrs.anita kumari singh,app ----- 02/ 11.01.2012 heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned app for the state. the petitioner is one of the seven named accused of a case which has been registered for offences under sections 304(b) and 201/34 of the indian penal code. informants niece pratima devi aged 23 years was married four years prior to the occurrence with subodh mahto, elder brother of the petitioner. when she died it was suspected that she was killed by her in-laws as she was unable to bring rs.10,000/- and one t.v. by way of 2 additional dowry. submission is that the petitioner being younger brother of the husband of the deceased has no connection with the demands or gains. considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of rs.10,000/-(rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned judicial magistrate, raxaul at motihari, east champaran in raxaul p.s.case no. 57 of 2011/trial no. 2304 of 2011. (shyam kishore sharma, j.) tahir/-

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1527 of 2012 Ranjit Mahto son of Bhadai Mahto,resident of village Gamaharia,P.S.Raxaul, District East Champaran Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- For the petitioner : Mr.Anil Kumar For the State : Mrs.Anita Kumari Singh,APP ----- 02/ 11.01.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. The petitioner is one of the seven named accused of a case which has been registered for offences under Sections 304(B) and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Informants niece Pratima Devi aged 23 years was married four years prior to the occurrence with Subodh Mahto, elder brother of the petitioner. When she died it was suspected that she was killed by her in-laws as she was unable to bring Rs.10,000/- and one T.V. by way of 2 additional dowry. Submission is that the petitioner being younger brother of the husband of the deceased has no connection with the demands or gains. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, Raxaul at Motihari, East Champaran in Raxaul P.S.Case No. 57 of 2011/Trial No. 2304 of 2011. (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.) Tahir/-

Same Court & Year Patna · 2012 Same Parties Ranjit Mahto vs The State of Bihar Same Subject Education