Brajesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar

Brajesh Kumar vs State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 11, 2012

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/975158

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/975158
Court: Patna High Court
Decided On: May 11, 2012
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Brajesh Kumar

Respondent

State of Bihar

Excerpt

.....contempt against the opposite parties for violation of the order dated 03.07.2003 passed in cwjc no.6178 of 1999 by which this court had set aside the notification no.187/cjc dated 01.07.1996 issued by the registrar, magadh university, and also the order dated 03.07.1996, issued by the principal, ans college, barh, whereby the petitioner was removed from service and directed to proceed in the matter afresh after giving notice to the petitioner. the petitioner raised a grievance that despite setting aside of the termination order of the petitioner and proceeding afresh in the matter nothing has been done. show cause had been filed by the university, wherein, it had been submitted that it repeatedly sought information about the petitioners service from the college concerned as well as the petitioner and as soon as the petitioner approaches the registrar of the university, full hearing would be given to him. the petitioner has filed a reply to show cause and in paragraph 3 it has been mentioned that he has sent all the relevant documents through registered post. thereafter a fresh show cause was filed on behalf of the university and it was explained that the petitioner was appointed on ad hoc basis which was withdrawn by the university which order was earlier quashed by this court. by letter dated 09.08.2009, the college was asked for details of 2 the petitioner to be placed before the audit team, but the college informed that the petitioner was not working either on sanctioned or un-sanctioned post since 1996 nor was there any record to substantiate that he was in service in college and, hence, the petitioners plea was not maintainable. no one appears on behalf of the petitioner today. the stand of the university is that it has taken all pains to examine the case records of the petitioner but on account of non-cooperation of the petitioner his case has not been considered. put up after two weeks retaining its position as a last chance to the parties to substantiate.....

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1880 of 2007 Brajesh Kumar Versus State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 11/ 11.01.2012 The petitioner has prayed for initiation of contempt against the opposite parties for violation of the order dated 03.07.2003 passed in CWJC No.6178 of 1999 by which this Court had set aside the notification no.187/CJC dated 01.07.1996 issued by the Registrar, Magadh University, and also the order dated 03.07.1996, issued by the Principal, ANS College, Barh, whereby the petitioner was removed from service and directed to proceed in the matter afresh after giving notice to the petitioner. The petitioner raised a grievance that despite setting aside of the termination order of the petitioner and proceeding afresh in the matter nothing has been done. Show cause had been filed by the University, wherein, it had been submitted that it repeatedly sought information about the petitioners service from the College concerned as well as the petitioner and as soon as the petitioner approaches the Registrar of the University, full hearing would be given to him. The petitioner has filed a reply to show cause and in paragraph 3 it has been mentioned that he has sent all the relevant documents through registered post. Thereafter a fresh show cause was filed on behalf of the University and it was explained that the petitioner was appointed on Ad hoc basis which was withdrawn by the University which order was earlier quashed by this Court. By letter dated 09.08.2009, the College was asked for details of 2 the petitioner to be placed before the Audit Team, but the College informed that the petitioner was not working either on sanctioned or un-sanctioned post since 1996 nor was there any record to substantiate that he was in service in College and, hence, the petitioners plea was not maintainable. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner today. The stand of the University is that it has taken all pains to examine the case records of the petitioner but on account of non-cooperation of the petitioner his case has not been considered. Put up after two weeks retaining its position as a last chance to the parties to substantiate their respective claims. JA/- (Anjana Prakash,J.)

Same Court & Year Patna · 2012 Same Parties Brajesh Kumar vs State of Bihar Same Subject Land Acquisition