Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Bajrangi Singh Vs. the State of Bihar

Bajrangi Singh vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 11, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/975154

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Bajrangi Singh

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.1759 of 2012 bajrangi singh son of bhoonath singh, resident of village bayganiya, p.s.- sahar, district- bhojpur versus the state of bihar ---------------------------------”11. 01.2012 heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the state. by order dated 26.03.2011 passed in cr. misc. no. 2957 of 2010 it was directed that in the event of arrest of surrender of the petitioner within a period of four weeks, petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount. petitioner did not surrender and filed an application for modification of the aforesaid order vide cr. misc. no. 27047 of 2011. considering the submissions the initial time allowed was extended by another period of three weeks vide order dated 17.08.2011. petitioner again did not surrender. learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that since the matter was amicably resolved between the husband and the wife and they are living together happily, in bonafide mistake, the petitioner, who was working in punjab, could not surrender. considering the submissions of the parties, the time allowed for surrender is extended by another three weeks from today in connection with sahar p.s. case no. 55 of 2009. the orders dated 26.03.2011 and 17.08.2011 passed in cr. misc. nos. 2957 of 2010 and 27047 of 2011 respectively are modified to the above extent. the cr. misc. application accordingly stands disposed of. let the orders dated 26.03.2011 and 17.08.2011 passed in cr. misc. nos. 2957 of 2010 and 27047 of 2011 respectively along with the present order be communicated to the court of chief judicial magistrate, bhojpur at ara in connection with sahar p.s. case no. 55 of 2009 through fax on the cost being deposited by the petitioner. manish/- ( shailesh kumar sinha,j.)

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1759 of 2012 Bajrangi Singh son of Bhoonath Singh, resident of village Bayganiya, P.S.- Sahar, District- Bhojpur Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------”

11. 01.2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. By order dated 26.03.2011 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 2957 of 2010 it was directed that in the event of arrest of surrender of the petitioner within a period of four weeks, petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount. Petitioner did not surrender and filed an application for modification of the aforesaid order vide Cr. Misc. No. 27047 of 2011. Considering the submissions the initial time allowed was extended by another period of three weeks vide order dated 17.08.2011. Petitioner again did not surrender. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that since the matter was amicably resolved between the husband and the wife and they are living together happily, in bonafide mistake, the petitioner, who was working in Punjab, could not surrender. Considering the submissions of the parties, the time allowed for surrender is extended by another three weeks from today in connection with Sahar P.S. Case No. 55 of 2009. The orders dated 26.03.2011 and 17.08.2011 passed in Cr. Misc. Nos. 2957 of 2010 and 27047 of 2011 respectively are modified to the above extent. The Cr. Misc. application accordingly stands disposed of. Let the orders dated 26.03.2011 and 17.08.2011 passed in Cr. Misc. Nos. 2957 of 2010 and 27047 of 2011 respectively along with the present order be communicated to the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara in connection with Sahar P.S. Case No. 55 of 2009 through FAX on the cost being deposited by the petitioner. Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial