Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Mahesh Rai Vs. the State of Bihar

Mahesh Rai vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 11, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/975142

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mahesh Rai

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.39214 of 2011 mahesh rai, son of late laldhari rai, r/o village mahua mukundpur, p.s. mahua, district vaishali. .petitioner versus the state of bihar ..opposite party ---------------- 03/- 11/01/2012 heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned additional public prosecutor for the state, who is armed with carbon/xerox copy of the case diary up to paragraph 30 dated 24/12/2011. the petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 419/420 of the indian penal code, 103 & 104 of trade mark act and 63/64 of the copy right act, is solitary named accused in this case on recovery of scrap articles said to be fake inclusive of empty bottles, covers and rappers to be used in huge quantity. submission is of false implication due to dispute of rent with the landlord and search and seizure conducted in absence of the petitioner. considering all such submission as aforementioned are not acceptable at this juncture. hence, finding no case for anticipatory bail and accordingly prayer of above named petitioner in connection with mahua p.s. case no. 349 of 2011, pending in the court of chief judicial magistrate, vaishali, is hereby refused. praveen/- ( akhilesh chandra, j.)

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.39214 of 2011 Mahesh Rai, Son of Late Laldhari Rai, R/o Village Mahua Mukundpur, P.S. Mahua, District Vaishali. .Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar ..Opposite Party ---------------- 03/- 11/01/2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, who is armed with carbon/xerox copy of the case diary up to paragraph 30 dated 24/12/2011. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 419/420 of the Indian Penal Code, 103 & 104 of Trade Mark Act and 63/64 of the Copy Right Act, is solitary named accused in this case on recovery of scrap articles said to be fake inclusive of empty bottles, covers and rappers to be used in huge quantity. Submission is of false implication due to dispute of rent with the landlord and search and seizure conducted in absence of the petitioner. Considering all such submission as aforementioned are not acceptable at this juncture. Hence, finding no case for anticipatory bail and accordingly prayer of above named petitioner in connection with Mahua P.S. Case No. 349 of 2011, pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali, is hereby refused. Praveen/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial