Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Chinta Devi and anr. Vs. the State of Bihar

Chinta Devi and anr. vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 11, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/975132

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Chinta Devi and anr.

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.36096 o”1. chinta devi w/o budhan kewat r/o village - kehuniyan, p.s. pranpur, district - katihar 2. dahani devi w/o raj kumar kewat r/o village - kehuniyan, p.s. pranpur, district - katihar versus the state of bihar ---------------------------------- 04. 11.01.2012 heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and the state. the petitioners are in custody in connection with pranpur p.s. case no. 13 of 2011 for offence punishable under sections 302/34 of the indian penal code on charge of having set the husband of the informant on fire. learned counsel for the petitioners submits that except for the hearsay statement made by the informant who is the wife of the deceased there is no other witness to the occurrence which took place in the broad day light. he submits that a family dispute is admitted and that it has also come during the course of investigation that the deceased was mentally unstable. he thus submits that in the circumstances the allegation set out against the petitioners is not probable. regard being had to the circumstances, let the petitioners, namely, chinta devi and dahani devi be released on bail upon each one of them individually furnishing bail bonds of rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned chief judicial magistrate, katihar in connection with pranpur p.s. case no. 13 of 2011. s.sb/- (jyoti saran, j.)

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.36096 o”

1. Chinta Devi W/O Budhan Kewat R/O Village - Kehuniyan, P.S. Pranpur, District - Katihar 2. Dahani Devi W/O Raj Kumar Kewat R/O Village - Kehuniyan, P.S. Pranpur, District - Katihar Versus The State of Bihar ---------------------------------- 04. 11.01.2012 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are in custody in connection with Pranpur P.S. Case No. 13 of 2011 for offence punishable under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code on charge of having set the husband of the informant on fire. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that except for the hearsay statement made by the informant who is the wife of the deceased there is no other witness to the occurrence which took place in the broad day light. He submits that a family dispute is admitted and that it has also come during the course of investigation that the deceased was mentally unstable. He thus submits that in the circumstances the allegation set out against the petitioners is not probable. Regard being had to the circumstances, let the petitioners, namely, Chinta Devi and Dahani Devi be released on bail upon each one of them individually furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar in connection with Pranpur P.S. Case No. 13 of 2011. S.Sb/- (Jyoti Saran, J.)

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial