Dileep Kumar Sinha Vs. the State of Bihar and ors

Dileep Kumar Sinha vs The State of Bihar and ors

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 11, 2012

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/975089

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/975089
Court: Patna High Court
Decided On: May 11, 2012
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Dileep Kumar Sinha

Respondent

The State of Bihar and ors

Excerpt

.....is informed that the anchal adhikari has been promoted as deputy collector and the circle inspector as circle officer. the latter is under the administrative control of the opposite party no.1. he has been placed under suspension and departmental proceedings have been initiated against him. departmental proceedings have also been initiated against the deputy collector by the department of general administration. the deputy collector has filed his reply and the district magistrate, gaya has been directed to submit his comments on the same. it has been submitted that both the proceedings are expected to be completed within two months. no fresh orders shall be passed by opposite party no.1 in the meantime with regard to the petitioner. the opposite party no.1 shall bring the present order to the attention of all concerned with regard to the patna high court mjc no.1587 of 2011 (5) dt.11-01-2012 2 departmental proceedings against the deputy collector and the circle officer. any impediment created in the expeditious conclusion of the departmental proceedings may expose the concerned to the risk of proceedings in the present matter. if subsistence allowance has not been paid to the petitioner, the court expects the opposite party no.1 to look into the same and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law in the meantime. it is also expected that the legitimate claims in that regard, if any, shall then be paid. list at the same position after two weeks. personal appearance of opposite party no.1 is dispensed with for the present only. (navin sinha, j) krishna chandra jha/-

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1587 of 2011 ====================================================== Dileep Kumar Sinha .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Virendra Prasad For the Respondent/s : Mr. Kundan Bhadur Singh Sc22 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA”

11. 01-2012 The Court is informed that the Anchal Adhikari has been promoted as Deputy Collector and the Circle Inspector as Circle Officer. The latter is under the administrative control of the opposite party No.1. He has been placed under suspension and departmental proceedings have been initiated against him. Departmental proceedings have also been initiated against the Deputy Collector by the Department of General Administration. The Deputy Collector has filed his reply and the District Magistrate, Gaya has been directed to submit his comments on the same. It has been submitted that both the proceedings are expected to be completed within two months. No fresh orders shall be passed by opposite party No.1 in the meantime with regard to the petitioner. The opposite party No.1 shall bring the present order to the attention of all concerned with regard to the Patna High Court MJC No.1587 of 2011 (5) dt.11-01-2012 2 departmental proceedings against the Deputy Collector and the Circle Officer. Any impediment created in the expeditious conclusion of the departmental proceedings may expose the concerned to the risk of proceedings in the present matter. If subsistence allowance has not been paid to the petitioner, the Court expects the opposite party No.1 to look into the same and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law in the meantime. It is also expected that the legitimate claims in that regard, if any, shall then be paid. List at the same position after two weeks. Personal appearance of opposite party No.1 is dispensed with for the present only. (Navin Sinha, J) Krishna Chandra Jha/-

Same Court & Year Patna · 2012 Same Parties Dileep Kumar Sinha vs The State of Bihar and ors Same Subject Education