Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Vishwanath Singh and ors Vs. the State of Bihar and ors

Vishwanath Singh and ors vs The State of Bihar and ors

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 11, 2012
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/975052

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Vishwanath Singh and ors

Respondent

The State of Bihar and ors

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna miscellaneous jurisdiction case no.3038 of 2011 vishwanath singh & ors versus the state of bihar & ors ---------------------------------”11. 1.2012 heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing on behalf of the state. the controversy now rests and centers around the fact whether the petitioner would be entitled to get the pay scale of the headmaster from the year 1996 or from the year 2004. the petitioner was granted promotion in 2004 w.e.f. 1996. the claim of the petitioner is that other juniors to him have been granted promotion and the pay scale from 1996 whereas the petitioner has not been given the same benefit. it is an accepted fact that the petitioner has joined on the post of headmaster in the year 2004 and he had never worked on the post of headmaster before that. this fact should be examined afresh by the district education officer, bhojpur at arrah and pass appropriate order by 17.2.2012. list this case for admission on 29.2.2012. in the mean time, the affidavit should be served on the counsel for the petitioner. sanjay (sheema ali khan, j.)

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3038 of 2011 Vishwanath Singh & Ors Versus The State of Bihar & Ors ---------------------------------”

11. 1.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The controversy now rests and centers around the fact whether the petitioner would be entitled to get the pay scale of the Headmaster from the year 1996 or from the year 2004. The petitioner was granted promotion in 2004 w.e.f. 1996. The claim of the petitioner is that other juniors to him have been granted promotion and the pay scale from 1996 whereas the petitioner has not been given the same benefit. It is an accepted fact that the petitioner has joined on the post of Headmaster in the year 2004 and he had never worked on the post of Headmaster before that. This fact should be examined afresh by the District Education Officer, Bhojpur at Arrah and pass appropriate order by 17.2.2012. List this case for admission on 29.2.2012. In the mean time, the affidavit should be served on the counsel for the petitioner. Sanjay (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial