Pappu Mukhia Vs. the State of Bihar

Pappu Mukhia vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 11, 2012

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/975049

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/975049
Court: Patna High Court
Decided On: May 11, 2012
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Pappu Mukhia

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.678 of 2012 pappu mukhia versus the state of bihar ---------------------------------- 2/ 11.1.2012 heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the state. the petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under section 376 of the indian penal code. initially the complaint case was lodged with accusation of establishing forceful physical relationship. there is nothing on record to show that the victim was medically examined. during investigation, the police found the allegations false and final form was submitted. on protest, cognizance has been taken. considering the fact that the accusation was found false by the police, let the above named petitioner be released on bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing the bail bond of rs.10000/(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of j.m. ist class, biraul at benipur, darbhanga in complaint case no. 101/08 (t.r. no. 1307 of 2001) subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the cr.p.c. anil/ (dinesh kumar singh, j.)

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.678 of 2012 Pappu Mukhia Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 2/ 11.1.2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a Complaint Case in which cognizance has been taken under section 376 of the Indian Penal Code. Initially the complaint case was lodged with accusation of establishing forceful physical relationship. There is nothing on record to show that the victim was medically examined. During investigation, the police found the allegations false and final form was submitted. On protest, cognizance has been taken. Considering the fact that the accusation was found false by the police, let the above named petitioner be released on bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing the bail bond of Rs.10000/(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of J.M. Ist Class, Biraul at Benipur, Darbhanga in Complaint Case no. 101/08 (T.R. No. 1307 of 2001) subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Anil/ (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)

Same Court & Year Patna · 2012 Same Parties Pappu Mukhia vs The State of Bihar Same Subject Education