Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Bijali Thakur and ors Vs. Rameshwar Thakur and ors

Bijali Thakur and ors vs Rameshwar Thakur and ors

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 11, 2012
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/975022

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Miscellaneous

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Miscellaneous

Key legal issue
Miscellaneous

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Bijali Thakur and ors

Respondent

Rameshwar Thakur and ors

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna first appeal no.3 of 1973 bijali thakur & ors versus rameshwar thakur & ors ---------------------------------- 134. 11.01.2012 heard the learned senior counsel, mr. s.s.dvivedi on behalf of the respondents on i.a. no.1834 of 2004 and the learned counsel, mr. madhav roy on behalf of the appellants. it appears that after hearing the parties at length by terms of order dated 16.05.1977, a division bench of this court held that the first appeal has abated. in view of the above prayer made by the respondents unless the order passed by the division bench is set aside or modified, the appeal cannot be restored. because the order has been passed by division bench, a single bench cannot either modify or alter or set aside the order passed by the division bench. therefore, in my opinion, this application filed by the respondents should be heard by a division bench. in such circumstances, the office may list this i.a. before appropriate division bench after obtaining leave from the honble the chief justice. saurabh (mungeshwar sahoo,j.)

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA First Appeal No.3 of 1973 Bijali Thakur & Ors Versus Rameshwar Thakur & Ors ---------------------------------- 134. 11.01.2012 Heard the learned senior counsel, Mr. S.S.Dvivedi on behalf of the respondents on I.A. No.1834 of 2004 and the learned counsel, Mr. Madhav Roy on behalf of the appellants. It appears that after hearing the parties at length by terms of order dated 16.05.1977, a Division Bench of this Court held that the First Appeal has abated. In view of the above prayer made by the respondents unless the order passed by the Division Bench is set aside or modified, the appeal cannot be restored. Because the order has been passed by Division Bench, a Single Bench cannot either modify or alter or set aside the order passed by the Division Bench. Therefore, in my opinion, this application filed by the respondents should be heard by a Division Bench. In such circumstances, the office may list this I.A. before appropriate Division Bench after obtaining leave from the Honble the Chief Justice. Saurabh (Mungeshwar Sahoo,J.)

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial