Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sunil Kumar and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar

Sunil Kumar and ors. vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 11, 2012
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/975011

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sunil Kumar and ors.

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.814 of 2012 sunil kumar & ors. versus the state of bihar ---------------------------------- 02. 11.01.2012 petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences under sections 452, 420, 380/34 of the i.p.c. the accusations are of entering into the house, committing theft and snatching gold chain. it appears that both sides are agnates and there is bona fide land dispute between the parties. the accusation levelled against the petitioners by their agnates in the background of serious land dispute clouds the bona fide of the accusation, let the petitioners namely 1. sunil kumar 2. ganga prasad mahto 3. maheshwar mahto @ maheshwar prasad mahto 4. sushil kumar @ mahabir mahto 5. hari kishun mahto 6. kalawati devi, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned additional chief judicial magistrate, rosera, samastipur in connection with rosera p.s. case no. 116 of 2011. shageer ( dinesh kumar singh, j)

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.814 of 2012 Sunil Kumar & Ors. Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 02. 11.01.2012 Petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences under Sections 452, 420, 380/34 of the I.P.C. The accusations are of entering into the house, committing theft and snatching gold chain. It appears that both sides are agnates and there is bona fide land dispute between the parties. The accusation levelled against the petitioners by their agnates in the background of serious land dispute clouds the bona fide of the accusation, let the petitioners namely 1. Sunil Kumar 2. Ganga Prasad Mahto 3. Maheshwar Mahto @ Maheshwar Prasad Mahto 4. Sushil Kumar @ Mahabir Mahto 5. Hari Kishun Mahto 6. Kalawati Devi, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rosera, Samastipur in connection with Rosera P.S. Case No. 116 of 2011. Shageer ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial