Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Lala Devi Vs. the State of Bihar

Lala Devi vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 11, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/974997

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Lala Devi

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.44609 of 2011 vimal kumar & anr. versus the state of bihar with criminal miscellaneous no.44762 of 2011 lala devi versus the state of bihar ---------------------------------”11. 01-2012 both the above-said cr. misc. cases arise out of kadamkuan p.s. case no. 354 of 2011 registered under sections-272, 273, 420/34, 467, 471 of the ipc and accordingly, both the above-said petitions are being disposed of by this common order. heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned additional public prosecutor for the state. allegedly, in huge quantity adulterated ghee were recovered from the house of petitioner in cr. misc. no. 44762 of 2011 and petitioners in cr. misc. no. 44609 of 2011 are said to be found working as labourers with the petitioner in cr. misc. no. 44762 of 2011. the contention of learned counsel for the petitioners is that no offence under indian penal code is made out and if the prosecution story is assumed to be true, then also, the case under prevention of food adulteration act is made out but without giving 2 any opportunity to challenge the analyst report, the petitioners have been sent to jail and the case has been lodged against them. considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as above-stated submission of the parties, let the petitioners, namely, vimal kumar, sudarshan kumar (in cr. misc. no.44609 of 2011) and lala devi ((in cr. misc. no. 44762 of 2011) are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with kadamkuan p.s. case no. 354 of 2011 to the satisfaction of chief judicial magistrate, patna. ( hemant kumar srivastava, j.) akvishwakarma

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.44609 of 2011 Vimal Kumar & Anr. Versus The State Of Bihar with Criminal Miscellaneous No.44762 of 2011 Lala Devi Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------”

11. 01-2012 Both the above-said Cr. Misc. Cases arise out of Kadamkuan P.S. Case No. 354 of 2011 registered under Sections-272, 273, 420/34, 467, 471 of the IPC and accordingly, both the above-said petitions are being disposed of by this common order. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Allegedly, in huge quantity adulterated Ghee were recovered from the house of petitioner in Cr. Misc. No. 44762 of 2011 and petitioners in Cr. Misc. No. 44609 of 2011 are said to be found working as labourers with the petitioner in Cr. Misc. No. 44762 of 2011. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioners is that no offence under Indian Penal Code is made out and if the prosecution story is assumed to be true, then also, the case under Prevention of Food Adulteration Act is made out but without giving 2 any opportunity to challenge the analyst report, the petitioners have been sent to jail and the case has been lodged against them. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as above-stated submission of the parties, let the petitioners, namely, Vimal Kumar, Sudarshan Kumar (in Cr. Misc. No.44609 of 2011) and Lala Devi ((in Cr. Misc. No. 44762 of 2011) are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Kadamkuan P.S. Case No. 354 of 2011 to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna. ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.) AKVishwakarma

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial