Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ajit Yadav Vs. the State of Bihar

Ajit Yadav vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 11, 2012
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/974972

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ajit Yadav

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.1443 of 2012 ajit yadav, son of sahdeo yadav, resident of mohalla-batraha, p.s.+district-saharsa. ..petitioner. versus the state of bihar ..opposite party. for the petitioner : mr. jyoti prabhakar, advocate. for the state : app. ---------------------------------- 02/ 11.01.2012 heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the state. the petitioner seeks bail in a case which has been registered under sections 307, 384 of the indian penal code, section 27 of the arms act and section 3/4 of the explosive substances act. submission is that though there is allegation of throwing bomb but nobody has been injured and the petitioner is in custody since 09.09.2011. it has also been submitted that identically situated accused mithun yadav @ hareram kumar @ hareram yadav has been admitted to bail by this court vide annexure-2. considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like 2 amount each to the satisfaction of the learned chief judicial magistrate/court concerned, saharsa in connection with saharsa p.s. case no. 420 of 2011. (shyam kishore sharma, j.) kksinha/-

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1443 of 2012 Ajit Yadav, Son of Sahdeo Yadav, Resident of Mohalla-Batraha, P.S.+District-Saharsa. ..Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar ..Opposite Party. For the Petitioner : Mr. Jyoti Prabhakar, Advocate. For the State : APP. ---------------------------------- 02/ 11.01.2012 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case which has been registered under Sections 307, 384 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 27 of the Arms Act and Section 3/4 of the Explosive Substances Act. Submission is that though there is allegation of throwing bomb but nobody has been injured and the petitioner is in custody since 09.09.2011. It has also been submitted that identically situated accused Mithun Yadav @ Hareram Kumar @ Hareram Yadav has been admitted to bail by this Court vide Annexure-2. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like 2 amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate/court concerned, Saharsa in connection with Saharsa P.S. Case No. 420 of 2011. (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.) kksinha/-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial