Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sant Sharan Prasad Vs. the State of Bihar and ors

Sant Sharan Prasad vs The State of Bihar and ors

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 11, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/974970

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sant Sharan Prasad

Respondent

The State of Bihar and ors

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna civil writ jurisdiction case no.540 o”1. sant sharan prasad s/o late keshav prasad resident of village- bilarpur, post- sand, p.s- sirdala, district- nawada. versus 1. the state of bihar.2. the principal secretary, human resources development department, government of bihar, new secretariat, patna.3. the director, primary education, government of bihar.4. the district education officer, nawada.5. the superintendent of education, nawada.6. bihar staff selection commissioner, patna through its secretary.7. the chairman, bihar staff selection commissioner, patna. ---------------------------------”11. 01.2012 the bihar staff selection commission has taken-up the exercise of appointment of trained assistant teacher in the state on the directions of the apex court. the apex court constituted a commission which examined the list of candidates etc. and had submitted its report on the basis of which directions were issued to the commission to initiate the process. as per the order dated 13.10.2011 passed in contempt petition (c) no.297 of 2007, the apex court has clearly restraint all courts from entertaining any objection or applications with regard to preparation of seniority list and roster 2 etc. the grievance of the petitioner in this writ application is that he had sent his application through speed post to the commission well within time, but his name does not appearing in the seniority list. in view of the restraint order of the apex court, this court cannot entertain this writ application. if the petitioner has any grievance he may raises it before the apex court in the connected matter. this writ application is dismissed. arvind/ ( j.n. singh, j.)

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.540 o”

1. Sant Sharan Prasad S/O Late Keshav Prasad Resident Of Village- Bilarpur, Post- Sand, P.S- Sirdala, District- Nawada. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar.

2. The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.

3. The Director, Primary Education, Government of Bihar.

4. The District Education Officer, Nawada.

5. The Superintendent Of Education, Nawada.

6. Bihar Staff Selection Commissioner, Patna Through Its Secretary.

7. The Chairman, Bihar Staff Selection Commissioner, Patna. ---------------------------------”

11. 01.2012 The Bihar Staff Selection Commission has taken-up the exercise of appointment of Trained Assistant Teacher in the State on the directions of the Apex Court. The Apex Court constituted a Commission which examined the list of candidates etc. and had submitted its report on the basis of which directions were issued to the Commission to initiate the process. As per the order dated 13.10.2011 passed in Contempt Petition (C) No.297 of 2007, the Apex Court has clearly restraint all Courts from entertaining any objection or applications with regard to preparation of seniority list and roster 2 etc. The grievance of the petitioner in this writ application is that he had sent his application through speed post to the Commission well within time, but his name does not appearing in the seniority list. In view of the restraint order of the Apex Court, this Court cannot entertain this writ application. If the petitioner has any grievance he may raises it before the Apex Court in the connected matter. This writ application is dismissed. Arvind/ ( J.N. Singh, J.)

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial