Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Satyendra Kumar @ Sachendra Kumar Vs. the State of Bihar

Satyendra Kumar @ Sachendra Kumar vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 11, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/974948

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Satyendra Kumar @ Sachendra Kumar

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.579 of 2012 ====================================================== satyendra kumar @ sachendra kumar .... .... petitioner/s versus the state of bihar .... .... opposite party/s =====================================================”11. 01-2012 heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the state. the petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under section 379 of the indian penal code and subsequently section 411, 420, 467, 468, 469 and 471/34 of the indian penal code has been added. the informants bolero vehicle was stolen away by the accused persons. it is alleged against the petitioner being the driver that he was driving that vehicle. it is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that from the confession of the co-accused it is apparent that the petitioner did not participate in committing the vehicle in question and for the same offence another case was also lodged against the petitioner in which the petitioner was granted bail and apart from these two cases, the petitioner has not involved in any other case. considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing the bail bond of rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned chief judicial magistrate, madhubani in connection with madhubani p.s. case no. 262 of 2010 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the cr.p.c. (dinesh kumar singh, j) amrendra kumar/-

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.579 of 2012 ====================================================== Satyendra Kumar @ Sachendra Kumar .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s =====================================================”

11. 01-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code and subsequently Section 411, 420, 467, 468, 469 and 471/34 of the Indian Penal Code has been added. The informants bolero vehicle was stolen away by the accused persons. It is alleged against the petitioner being the driver that he was driving that vehicle. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that from the confession of the co-accused it is apparent that the petitioner did not participate in committing the vehicle in question and for the same offence another case was also lodged against the petitioner in which the petitioner was granted bail and apart from these two cases, the petitioner has not involved in any other case. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing the bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani in connection with Madhubani P.S. Case No. 262 of 2010 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) Amrendra Kumar/-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial