Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Dayamanti Devi Vs. State of Bihar and ors

Dayamanti Devi vs State of Bihar and ors

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 13, 2012
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/974928

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Dayamanti Devi

Respondent

State of Bihar and ors

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.42404 of 2008 dayamanti devi versus state of bihar & ors ---------------------------------”13. 01.2012 perused the office notes and heard learned counsel for the petitioner. it has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that vide order dated 13.10.2011 passed by a bench of this court, notices were directed to be issued to opposite party nos. 2 to 6 and the requisites for issuance of notice upon opposite party nos. 2 to 6 were filed by him but inadvertently order was typed to issue notice to opposite party no. 2 only and the same has been received by his father, who is opposite party no. 5 in this application. in view of the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner, let this matter be listed before the appropriate bench after obtaining the permission of the honble the chief justice. (rajendra kumar mishra, j.) safik

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.42404 of 2008 Dayamanti Devi Versus State Of Bihar & Ors ---------------------------------”

13. 01.2012 Perused the office notes and heard learned counsel for the petitioner. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that vide order dated 13.10.2011 passed by a Bench of this Court, notices were directed to be issued to opposite party nos. 2 to 6 and the requisites for issuance of notice upon opposite party nos. 2 to 6 were filed by him but inadvertently order was typed to issue notice to opposite party no. 2 only and the same has been received by his father, who is opposite party no. 5 in this application. In view of the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner, let this matter be listed before the appropriate Bench after obtaining the permission of the Honble the Chief Justice. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J.) Safik

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial