Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Rakesh Singh @ Rakesh Kmar and anr. Vs. the State of Bihar

Rakesh Singh @ Rakesh Kmar and anr. vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 13, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/974900

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rakesh Singh @ Rakesh Kmar and anr.

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.42202 o”1. rakesh singh @ rakesh kumar, son of rajendra singh 2. raju singh alias rajeev nayan kumar, son of rajendra singh. -------- petitioners. versus the state of bihar --opposite party ****** 02. 13.01.2012 heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned additional public prosecutor for the state. the petitioners, apprehending their arrest in connection with muffasil p.s. case no. 223/2011 for offences under sections 7 and 8 of bihar minerals prevention of illegal mining and transportation and storage act rule 4/40 of b.m.c. rules, 21(a) of air pollution act 1981 and section 15 of environmental (protection) act and section 379 and 406 of the indian penal code, are named accused in this case. submission is that under similarly situated circumstances manoj singh and mukesh singh have already been granted privilege by a bench of this court vide order dated 14.12.2011 passed in cr. misc. no. 42540/2011. considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks, let the above-named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of sum of rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of chief judicial magistrate, gaya, in connection with muffasil p.s. case no. 223/2011, subject to condition under section 438(2) of the code of criminal procedure, and additional condition to attend the court regularly at least for two years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates, without any reasonable explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. rajeev/- ( akhilesh chandra, j.)

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.42202 o”

1. Rakesh Singh @ Rakesh Kumar, son of Rajendra Singh 2. Raju Singh alias Rajeev Nayan Kumar, son of Rajendra Singh. -------- Petitioners. Versus The State Of Bihar --Opposite Party ****** 02. 13.01.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioners, apprehending their arrest in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 223/2011 for offences under Sections 7 and 8 of Bihar Minerals Prevention of Illegal Mining and Transportation and Storage Act Rule 4/40 of B.M.C. Rules, 21(A) of Air Pollution Act 1981 and Section 15 of Environmental (Protection) Act and Section 379 and 406 of the Indian Penal Code, are named accused in this case. submission is that under similarly situated circumstances Manoj Singh and Mukesh Singh have already been granted privilege by a Bench of this Court vide order dated 14.12.2011 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 42540/2011. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks, let the above-named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of sum of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 223/2011, subject to condition under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and additional condition to attend the court regularly at least for two years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates, without any reasonable explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Rajeev/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial