Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sanjay Kumar Yadav Vs. the State of Bihar

Sanjay Kumar Yadav vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 13, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/974897

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sanjay Kumar Yadav

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.160 of 2012 sanjay kumar yadav versus the state of bihar 2. 13.01.2012. learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in prayer portion of the petition. heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the state. the petitioner is languishing in custody since 23.07.2011 in a case registered for the offence under section 379 of the indian penal code. the accusation is of committing theft of motorcycle. subsequently, the alleged motorcycle was recovered from possession of petitioner for which a separate case under section 414 of the i.p.c. was registered in which the petitioner is on bail. it is submitted that the petitioner purchased the motorcycle without knowing the fact that it was stolen motorcycle and on that ground the petitioner was granted bail. it is orally submitted that apart from the present case the petitioner is not involved in any other case. considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned a.c.j.m., danapur, in connection with naubatpur p.s. case no. 55 of 2011. u. k. ( dinesh kumar singh, j)

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.160 of 2012 Sanjay Kumar Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar 2. 13.01.2012. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in prayer portion of the petition. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 23.07.2011 in a case registered for the offence under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is of committing theft of motorcycle. Subsequently, the alleged motorcycle was recovered from possession of petitioner for which a separate case under Section 414 of the I.P.C. was registered in which the petitioner is on bail. It is submitted that the petitioner purchased the motorcycle without knowing the fact that it was stolen motorcycle and on that ground the petitioner was granted bail. It is orally submitted that apart from the present case the petitioner is not involved in any other case. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M., Danapur, in connection with Naubatpur P.S. Case No. 55 of 2011. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial