Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Prakash Kumar JaIn Vs. the Patna Regional Development

Prakash Kumar Jain vs The Patna Regional Development

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 13, 2012
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/974872

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Prakash Kumar Jain

Respondent

The Patna Regional Development

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna letters patent appeal no.1663 of 2011 in civil writ jurisdiction case no. 6129 of 2006 with interlocutory application no. 7667 of 2011 in letters patent appeal no. 1663 of 2011 ====================================================== prakash kumar jain .... .... appellant/s versus the patna regional development authority & ors. .... .... respondent/s ====================================================== appearance : for the appellant/s : mr. shrawan kumar singh, sr. advocate. mr. ashok kumar dubey, advocate. for the respondent corporation: mr. bishwa bibhuti kr. singh, advocate. for the respondent no. 5: mr. j.s.arora with mr. arun, advocates. ====================================================== coram: honourable the chief justice and honourable mr. justice birendra prasad verma oral order (per: honourable the chief justice”13. 01-2012 re. interlocutory application no. 7667 of 2011: the delay of 132 days occurred in filing the letters patent appeal is condoned. interlocutory application stands disposed of. re. letters patent appeal no. 1663 of 2011: notify for admission. (r.m. doshit, cj) (birendra prasad verma, j) sujit/-

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.1663 of 2011 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 6129 of 2006 With Interlocutory Application No. 7667 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No. 1663 of 2011 ====================================================== Prakash Kumar Jain .... .... Appellant/s Versus The Patna Regional Development Authority & Ors. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Shrawan Kumar Singh, Sr. Advocate. Mr. Ashok Kumar Dubey, Advocate. For the Respondent Corporation: Mr. Bishwa Bibhuti Kr. Singh, Advocate. For the Respondent no. 5: Mr. J.S.Arora with Mr. Arun, Advocates. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE”

13. 01-2012 Re. Interlocutory Application No. 7667 of 2011: The delay of 132 days occurred in filing the Letters Patent Appeal is condoned. Interlocutory application stands disposed of. Re. Letters Patent Appeal No. 1663 of 2011: Notify for admission. (R.M. Doshit, CJ) (Birendra Prasad Verma, J) Sujit/-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial