Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Yadunath Das Vs. the State of Bihar and ors

Yadunath Das vs The State of Bihar and ors

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 13, 2012
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/974856

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Yadunath Das

Respondent

The State of Bihar and ors

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna criminal appeal (db) no.1140 of 2011 yadunath das, son of shri singhashan das, resident of village- gaddupur, p.s.-harsidhi, district-east champaran. appellant versus 1. the state of bihar.2. bachchan das, son of late narayan das.3. vinod das, son of bachchan das.4. pinchoo das, son of bachchan das. all are residents of village-gaddupur, p.s.-harsidhi, district-west champaran. respondents. ------------------”13. 01.2012 this is an appeal against the acquittal filed by the injured informant. there is a delay of almost two months in filing the appeal. during trial, it appears that the informant took a back seat. the only witness was examined was his father, who admitted that it was a case lodged by his son against fathers brother. no other witness was examined by the prosecution even the informant himself was not examined and pursuant to which, the trial court could only acquit the persons of the charge of section 307 ipc. we see no reason to interfere as we do not find that the trial court has committed any illegality in the matter. this matter is dismissed accordingly. (navaniti prasad singh, j.) sanjeet/ (ashwani kumar singh, j.)

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Appeal (DB) No.1140 of 2011 Yadunath Das, son of Shri Singhashan Das, resident of village- Gaddupur, P.S.-Harsidhi, District-East Champaran. Appellant Versus 1. The State of Bihar.

2. Bachchan Das, son of Late Narayan Das.

3. Vinod Das, son of Bachchan Das.

4. Pinchoo Das, son of Bachchan Das. All are residents of village-Gaddupur, P.S.-Harsidhi, District-West Champaran. Respondents. ------------------”

13. 01.2012 This is an appeal against the acquittal filed by the injured informant. There is a delay of almost two months in filing the appeal. During trial, it appears that the informant took a back seat. The only witness was examined was his father, who admitted that it was a case lodged by his son against fathers brother. No other witness was examined by the prosecution even the informant himself was not examined and pursuant to which, the trial court could only acquit the persons of the charge of Section 307 IPC. We see no reason to interfere as we do not find that the trial court has committed any illegality in the matter. This matter is dismissed accordingly. (Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.) Sanjeet/ (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.)

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial