Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sanjeev Kumar @ Sanjeev Kumar Singh Vs. the State of Bihar

Sanjeev Kumar @ Sanjeev Kumar Singh vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 13, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/974836

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sanjeev Kumar @ Sanjeev Kumar Singh

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

.....public prosecutor for the state. both petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with barahara p.s. case no. 165/2011 for the offences under sections 409 of the indian penal code, are named accused in this case as p.d.s. dealer to whom some amount of food-grains was kept for distribution under sgr yojana during the period 2002-2004. some quantity of grains are still lying, neither it is being returned nor money is being deposited. submission is that in fact it is a matter of accounting and petitioners have already deposited more than 35% of value of rice contained in respective notices issued against them and vide order dated 22.12.2011 passed in c.w.j.c. no. 19422/2011, they are required to submit detailed representation within six weeks which are to be disposed of within subsequent four month by the b.d.o. barhara, bhojpur, meanwhile, no coercive steps is to be taken against them. considering the facts and circumstances of the case specifically orders of this court aforementioned, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks, subject to filing of representation as ordered in c.w.j.c. no. 19422/2011, let the above-named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of sum of rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of chief judicial magistrate, bhojpur, ara, in connection with barahara p.s. case no. 165/2011, subject to condition under section 438(2) of the code of criminal procedure, and additional condition to attend the court regularly till filing of representation, in the event of failure on two consecutive dates, without any reasonable explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. rajeev/- ( akhilesh chandra, j.)

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.42220 of 2011 Sanjeev Kumar @ Sanjeev Kumar Singh S/O Late Surendra Singh R/O Village - Gajiapur, Police Station - Krishnagarh ( Barahara ), District - Bhojpur ( Ara ). ------- Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar -----Opposite Party ******* With Criminal Miscellaneous No.44255 of 2011 Jitendra Kumar, son of Yugeshwar Sah, resident of village - Saraiya, P.S. Krishnagarh (Barahara), District-Bhojpur. -------- Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar ---Opposite Party ******* 02. 13.01.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Both petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with Barahara P.S. Case No. 165/2011 for the offences under Sections 409 of the Indian Penal Code, are named accused in this case as P.D.S. Dealer to whom some amount of food-grains was kept for distribution under SGR Yojana during the period 2002-2004. Some quantity of grains are still lying, neither it is being returned nor money is being deposited. Submission is that in fact it is a matter of accounting and petitioners have already deposited more than 35% of value of rice contained in respective notices issued against them and vide order dated 22.12.2011 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 19422/2011, they are required to submit detailed representation within six weeks which are to be disposed of within subsequent four month by the B.D.O. Barhara, Bhojpur, meanwhile, no coercive steps is to be taken against them. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case specifically orders of this court aforementioned, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks, subject to filing of representation as ordered in C.W.J.C. No. 19422/2011, let the above-named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of sum of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur, Ara, in connection with Barahara P.S. Case No. 165/2011, subject to condition under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and additional condition to attend the court regularly till filing of representation, in the event of failure on two consecutive dates, without any reasonable explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Rajeev/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial