Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Mamta Devi Vs. the State of Bihar

Mamta Devi vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 13, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/974812

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mamta Devi

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.42681 of 2011 mamta devi, wife of ajay kumar versus the state of bihar ---------------------------------- 2. 13.1.2012 heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the state. the petitioner is apprehending her arrest in a case registered under section 304b/34 of the indian penal code. considering that the petitioner is the married sister- in-law of the deceased and final report was submitted with regard to the petitioner and the charge sheet was finally submitted u/s.306 i.p.c., let the petitioner above named be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of four weeks from today in connection with jehanabad p.s. case no.231 of 2011 on furnishing bail bonds of rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of additional district judge 2nd, jehanabad, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the code of criminal procedure as also conditions (i) that one of the bailor will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. the bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in address of the petitioner, (ii) that the petitioner will give an undertaking that she will receive the police papers on the given date and be -2- present on date fixed for charge and if she fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, her bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, (iii) that the petitioner will be well represented on each date if she fails to do so on two consecutive dates, her bail will be liable to be cancelled. narendra/ ( anjana prakash, j.)

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.42681 of 2011 Mamta Devi, wife of Ajay Kumar Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 2. 13.1.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending her arrest in a case registered under Section 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that the petitioner is the married sister- in-law of the deceased and final report was submitted with regard to the petitioner and the charge sheet was finally submitted u/s.306 I.P.C., let the petitioner above named be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of four weeks from today in connection with Jehanabad P.S. case No.231 of 2011 on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional District Judge 2nd, Jehanabad, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as also conditions (i) That one of the bailor will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioner, (ii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that she will receive the police papers on the given date and be -2- present on date fixed for charge and if she fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, her bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date if she fails to do so on two consecutive dates, her bail will be liable to be cancelled. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J.

)

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial