Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Rakesh Ranjan and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar and anr.

Rakesh Ranjan and ors. vs The State of Bihar and anr.

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 13, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/974796

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rakesh Ranjan and ors.

Respondent

The State of Bihar and anr.

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.30338 of 2011 rakesh ranjan & ors. versus the state of bihar & anr. ---------------------------------- 2. 13.1.2012 heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the state. this matter relates to a civil dispute. the complainant has filed the present case stating therein that petitioner no.1 had taken an amount of rs.1,000/- for the purpose of his land on lease. later on he has paid rs.15,000/- to petitioner no.1 for executing an agreement for sale but he has not honoured his agreement. it has been further stated in the complaint petition that it was agreed to sale the land on rs. 2,62,500/-. thereafter one ragini ranjan filed a case before the lok adalat and got the land partitioned between themselves in order to frustrate the agreement. it has been further alleged in paragraph 11 of the complaint petition that the complainant has also filed one title suit no.70 of 2003 for specific performance of contract and the same is pending. issue notice to opposite party no.2 under ordinary course as well as registered post with a/d for 2 which requisites etc. must be filed within a period of one week, failing which this application as against him shall stand rejected without further reference to the bench. in the meanwhile, further proceeding in complaint case no. 1377-c of 2007 pending in the court of the sub divisional judicial magistrate, buxar shall remain stayed. vinay/ ( shivaji pandey, j.)

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.30338 of 2011 Rakesh Ranjan & Ors. Versus The State Of Bihar & Anr. ---------------------------------- 2. 13.1.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. This matter relates to a civil dispute. The complainant has filed the present case stating therein that petitioner no.1 had taken an amount of Rs.1,000/- for the purpose of his land on lease. Later on he has paid Rs.15,000/- to petitioner no.1 for executing an agreement for sale but he has not honoured his agreement. It has been further stated in the complaint petition that it was agreed to sale the land on Rs. 2,62,500/-. Thereafter one Ragini Ranjan filed a case before the Lok Adalat and got the land partitioned between themselves in order to frustrate the agreement. It has been further alleged in paragraph 11 of the complaint petition that the complainant has also filed one Title Suit No.70 of 2003 for specific performance of contract and the same is pending. Issue notice to opposite party no.2 under ordinary course as well as registered post with A/D for 2 which requisites etc. must be filed within a period of one week, failing which this application as against him shall stand rejected without further reference to the Bench. In the meanwhile, further proceeding in Complaint Case No. 1377-C of 2007 pending in the Court of the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Buxar shall remain stayed. Vinay/ ( Shivaji Pandey, J.)

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial