Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Pawan Devi and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar

Pawan Devi and ors. vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 13, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/974789

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Pawan Devi and ors.

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.1119 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. pawan devi 2. bum bahadur yadav 3. baiju kumar .... .... petitioners versus the state of bihar .... .... opposite party/s =====================================================”13. 01-2012 heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the state. the petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under sections 447, 341, 323, 504 and 506/34 of the indian penal code and section 3, 4 and 5 of the witch craft (dian) practices act. the accusation is of making assault and calling by addressing dian and putting some yellow substance on the mouth of the informant. it is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that both sides are agnates and for the occurrence of 28.12.2010 the complaint was lodged on 30.01.2011. considering the delayed filing of the complaint which clouds the bona fide of the accusation, let the above named petitioners be released on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing the bail bond of rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned additional chief judicial magistrate, dalsingsarai (samastipur) in connection with angarghat p.s. case no. 09/2011 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the cr.p.c. (dinesh kumar singh, j) amrendra kumar/-

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1119 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Pawan Devi 2. Bum Bahadur Yadav 3. Baiju Kumar .... .... Petitioners Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s =====================================================”

13. 01-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 447, 341, 323, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3, 4 and 5 of the Witch Craft (Dian) Practices Act. The accusation is of making assault and calling by addressing Dian and putting some yellow substance on the mouth of the informant. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that both sides are agnates and for the occurrence of 28.12.2010 the complaint was lodged on 30.01.2011. Considering the delayed filing of the complaint which clouds the bona fide of the accusation, let the above named petitioners be released on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing the bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dalsingsarai (Samastipur) in connection with Angarghat P.S. Case No. 09/2011 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) Amrendra Kumar/-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial