Dinesh Rai Vs. the State of Bihar

Dinesh Rai vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 13, 2012

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/974773

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/974773
Court: Patna High Court
Decided On: May 13, 2012
Subject: Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue: Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Dinesh Rai

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.42185 of 2011 dinesh rai, son of nirsan rai ------ petitioner. versus the state of bihar ---opposite party ******* 02. 13.01.2012 heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned additional public prosecutor for the state. the petitioner, apprehends his arrest in connection with dumra p.s. case no. 199/2011, for offences under section 420, 466, 467, 471/120b of the indian penal code, is one of the named accused in this case being purchaser of land from son of the informant on the basis of one power of attorney which is now disputed. considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks, let the above-named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of sum of rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of chief judicial magistrate, sitamarhi, in connection with dumra p.s. case no. 199/2011, subject to condition under section 438(2) of the code of criminal procedure, and additional condition to attend the court regularly till disposal of the case, in the event of failure on two consecutive dates, without any reasonable explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. rajeev/- ( akhilesh chandra, j.)

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.42185 of 2011 Dinesh Rai, son of Nirsan Rai ------ Petitioner. Versus The State Of Bihar ---Opposite Party ******* 02. 13.01.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner, apprehends his arrest in connection with Dumra P.S. Case No. 199/2011, for offences under Section 420, 466, 467, 471/120B of the Indian Penal Code, is one of the named accused in this case being purchaser of land from son of the informant on the basis of one power of attorney which is now disputed. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks, let the above-named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of sum of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi, in connection with Dumra P.S. Case No. 199/2011, subject to condition under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and additional condition to attend the court regularly till disposal of the case, in the event of failure on two consecutive dates, without any reasonable explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Rajeev/- ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)

Same Court & Year Patna · 2012 Same Parties Dinesh Rai vs The State of Bihar Same Subject Criminal