Sunil Kumar Singh @ Sunil Singh and ors Vs. the State of Bihar

Sunil Kumar Singh @ Sunil Singh and ors vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 13, 2012

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/974764

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/974764
Court: Patna High Court
Decided On: May 13, 2012
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sunil Kumar Singh @ Sunil Singh and ors

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

.....468, 471 and 504 of the indian penal code. it is alleged that petitioner no.1, sunil kumar singh @ sunil singh used to deal the stolen cars and the complainant purchased the vehicle for consideration money of rs. 4,60,000/- for which rs. 4,00,000/- were paid but rest rs. 60,000/- was to paid after handing over of the original documents of the vehicle but the same was never handed over to the complainant. subsequently the complainant came to know that vehicle was stolen he handed over the vehicle to the police station. considering the fact that the thrust of accusation is against petitioner no.1, this court is not inclined to grant bail to petitioner no.1 sunil kumar singh @ sunil singh, let the learned court 2 below consider the regular bail application of petitioner no.1 sunil kumar singh @ sunil singh keeping in view that the cognizance has been taken in the complaint case and for the alleged offence a separate police case was lodged in which sunil kumar singh @ sunil singh has been granted bail. considering the fact that petitioner nos. 2 and 3 being the brother and father of petitioner no.1 sunil kumar singh @ sunil singh having no specific accusation, let the above named petitioner nos. 2 and 3 be released on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing the bail bond of rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned judicial magistrate, 1st class, nawada in connection with complaint case no. 463 of 2010 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the cr.p.c. (dinesh kumar singh, j) anjani /-

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1095 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Sunil Kumar Singh @ Sunil Singh.

2. Sushil Kumar Singh @ Sushil Singh.

3. Ganeshwar Prasad Singh @ Ganesh Prasad Singh @ Ganesh Prasad. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s =====================================================”

13. 01-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 420, 465, 468, 471 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged that petitioner no.1, Sunil Kumar Singh @ Sunil Singh used to deal the stolen cars and the complainant purchased the vehicle for consideration money of Rs. 4,60,000/- for which Rs. 4,00,000/- were paid but rest Rs. 60,000/- was to paid after handing over of the original documents of the vehicle but the same was never handed over to the complainant. Subsequently the complainant came to know that vehicle was stolen he handed over the vehicle to the police station. Considering the fact that the thrust of accusation is against petitioner no.1, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to petitioner no.1 Sunil Kumar Singh @ Sunil Singh, let the learned court 2 below consider the regular bail application of petitioner no.1 Sunil Kumar Singh @ Sunil Singh keeping in view that the cognizance has been taken in the complaint case and for the alleged offence a separate police case was lodged in which Sunil Kumar Singh @ Sunil Singh has been granted bail. Considering the fact that petitioner nos. 2 and 3 being the brother and father of petitioner no.1 Sunil Kumar Singh @ Sunil Singh having no specific accusation, let the above named petitioner nos. 2 and 3 be released on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing the bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Nawada in connection with Complaint Case No. 463 of 2010 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) Anjani /-

Same Court & Year Patna · 2012 Same Parties Sunil Kumar Singh @ Sunil Singh and ors vs The State of Bihar Same Subject Education