Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Masud @ Masud Alam Vs. the State of Bihar

Masud @ Masud Alam vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 13, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/974757

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Masud @ Masud Alam

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.1061 of 2012 ====================================================== masud @ masud alam .... .... petitioner/s versus the state of bihar .... .... opposite party/s =====================================================”13. 01-2012 heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the state. the petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under section 376 of the indian penal code. it is alleged that on 01.06.2008 the petitioner and one mansoor offered the tea with some intoxicant and thereafter both of them established forceful physical relationship with the complainant. it is submitted that for the occurrence of 01.06.2008 the complaint has been filed on 18.12.2008 and six months thereafter the protest petition was filed. it appears that the police during investigation found the accusation false and submitted final form, and on protest the cognizance has been taken, a certified copy of the same has been produced before this court, let it be kept on record. considering the delayed lodging of the complaint after six months of the occurrence and the fact that the accusation was 2 found false by the police, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing the bail bond of rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned chief judicial magistrate, katihar in connection with c.a. no. 3645 of 2009 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the cr.p.c. (dinesh kumar singh, j) anjani /-

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1061 of 2012 ====================================================== Masud @ Masud Alam .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s =====================================================”

13. 01-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged that on 01.06.2008 the petitioner and one Mansoor offered the tea with some intoxicant and thereafter both of them established forceful physical relationship with the complainant. It is submitted that for the occurrence of 01.06.2008 the complaint has been filed on 18.12.2008 and six months thereafter the protest petition was filed. It appears that the police during investigation found the accusation false and submitted final form, and on protest the cognizance has been taken, a certified copy of the same has been produced before this Court, let it be kept on record. Considering the delayed lodging of the complaint after six months of the occurrence and the fact that the accusation was 2 found false by the police, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing the bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar in connection with C.A. No. 3645 of 2009 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) Anjani /-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial