Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Santosh Kumar Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.

Santosh Kumar vs The State of Bihar and ors.

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 13, 2012
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/974754

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Santosh Kumar

Respondent

The State of Bihar and ors.

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.2076 of 2012 santosh kumar versus the state of bihar & ors. ---------------------------------”13. 01.2012 this is an application for restoration of cr.misc.no. 42877 of 2010 which stood rejected for not having been complied with the peremptory order dated 5.4.2011 within time granted to the petitioner to file requisites under both process for issuance of notice upon opposite party no.2. learned counsel submits that due to some misunderstanding the requisites under both processes could not be filed within time granted by this court though the same were filed in the office on 29.4.2011 after expiry of peremptory order. as such, it is prayed that the case be restored to its original file. in view of submissions, the restoration application is allowed and cr.misc.no. 42877 of 2010 is restored to its original file. necessary requisites, if filed by the petitioner for issuance of notice on opposite party no.2 under both processes be accepted. office to proceed accordingly. ai ( mandhata singh, j.)

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.2076 of 2012 Santosh Kumar Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors. ---------------------------------”

13. 01.2012 This is an application for restoration of Cr.Misc.No. 42877 of 2010 which stood rejected for not having been complied with the peremptory order dated 5.4.2011 within time granted to the petitioner to file requisites under both process for issuance of notice upon opposite party no.2. Learned counsel submits that due to some misunderstanding the requisites under both processes could not be filed within time granted by this Court though the same were filed in the office on 29.4.2011 after expiry of peremptory order. As such, it is prayed that the case be restored to its original file. In view of submissions, the restoration application is allowed and Cr.Misc.No. 42877 of 2010 is restored to its original file. Necessary requisites, if filed by the petitioner for issuance of notice on opposite party no.2 under both processes be accepted. Office to proceed accordingly. AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial