Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Chandan Kumar Verma @ Chandan Kumar Vs. the State of Bihar

Chandan Kumar Verma @ Chandan Kumar vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 13, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/974732

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Chandan Kumar Verma @ Chandan Kumar

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.1099 of 2012 ====================================================== chandan kumar verma @ chandan kumar .... .... petitioner/s versus the state of bihar .... .... opposite party/s =====================================================”13. 01-2012 heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the state. the petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under section 420 of the indian penal code. it is alleged that the complainant purchased certain lands from the landholder but in the land record the name of the village was given different name. it was agreed between the vender and vendee that a correction deed will be executed but subsequently, the correction deed was not executed and the land was sold in favour of some other person, the petitioner was scribe of the second sale deed. considering the fact that the thrust of the accusation is against the vendee, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing the bail bond of rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 2 judicial magistrate, sitamarhi in connection with complaint case no. 1021 of 2010 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the cr.p.c. (dinesh kumar singh, j) anjani /-

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1099 of 2012 ====================================================== Chandan Kumar Verma @ Chandan Kumar .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s =====================================================”

13. 01-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged that the complainant purchased certain lands from the landholder but in the land record the name of the village was given different name. It was agreed between the vender and vendee that a correction deed will be executed but subsequently, the correction deed was not executed and the land was sold in favour of some other person, the petitioner was scribe of the second sale deed. Considering the fact that the thrust of the accusation is against the vendee, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing the bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 2 Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi in connection with Complaint Case No. 1021 of 2010 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) Anjani /-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial