Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Mukund Kumar Vs. the State of Bihar and anr.

Mukund Kumar vs The State of Bihar and anr.

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 13, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/974728

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mukund Kumar

Respondent

The State of Bihar and anr.

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.33913 of 2011 ====================================================== mukund kumar .... .... petitioner/s versus the state of bihar & anr. .... .... opposite party/s =====================================================”13. 01-2012 heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the state. the petitioner being the husband is apprehending his arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under sections 323, 498a and 379 of the indian penal code and section 3/4 of the dowry prohibition act. the petitioner and opposite party no.2 are present. both sides are ready for reconciliation. the petitioner is ready to take the complainant to her matrimonial house from the court itself to keep her as wife with full dignity and honour. considering the stand of the parties, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing the bail bond of rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned sub-divisional judicial magistrate, rosera, samastipur in connection with t.r. no. 2272 of 2010 (c.r. no. 766 of 2009) subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the cr.p.c. the opposite party no.2 will be at liberty to file an application for cancellation of the bail of the petitioner if the petitioner violates the undertaking given before this court. (dinesh kumar singh, j) amrendra kumar/-

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.33913 of 2011 ====================================================== Mukund Kumar .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar & Anr. .... .... Opposite Party/s =====================================================”

13. 01-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being the husband is apprehending his arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 323, 498A and 379 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The petitioner and opposite party no.2 are present. Both sides are ready for reconciliation. The petitioner is ready to take the complainant to her matrimonial house from the court itself to keep her as wife with full dignity and honour. Considering the stand of the parties, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing the bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Rosera, Samastipur in connection with T.R. No. 2272 of 2010 (C.R. No. 766 of 2009) subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. The opposite party no.2 will be at liberty to file an application for cancellation of the bail of the petitioner if the petitioner violates the undertaking given before this Court. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) Amrendra Kumar/-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial