Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Devendra Kumar Singh Vs. the State of Bihar

Devendra Kumar Singh vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 12, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/974719

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Devendra Kumar Singh

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.904 of 2012 ====================================================== devendra kumar singh .... .... petitioner/s versus the state of bihar .... .... opposite party/s =====================================================”12. 01-2012 heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the state. the petitioner being the pds dealer is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under section 420 of the indian penal code and section 7 of the excise act. it is alleged that instead of 35 kgs of grains at the rate of rs. 105/- the petitioner supplied only 25 kgs grains at the rate of rs. 160/- and also supplied 2.50 liters kerosene oil in stead of 2.75 liters to the beneficiaries. it is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that on record the distribution has properly been made as per the norms and the beneficiaries have also denied the accusation during the investigation. it is further submitted that from the f.i.r. it does not appear that any verification of the record has been done before the lodging the f.i.r. and the p.d.s. dealership of the petitioner has been suspended. considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing the bail bond of rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned additional chief judicial magistrate, hilsa, nalanda in connection with aungari p.s. case no. 27/2011 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the cr.p.c. (dinesh kumar singh, j) amrendra kumar/-

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.904 of 2012 ====================================================== Devendra Kumar Singh .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s =====================================================”

12. 01-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioner being the PDS dealer is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 7 of the Excise Act. It is alleged that instead of 35 Kgs of grains at the rate of Rs. 105/- the petitioner supplied only 25 Kgs grains at the rate of Rs. 160/- and also supplied 2.50 liters kerosene oil in stead of 2.75 liters to the beneficiaries. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that on record the distribution has properly been made as per the norms and the beneficiaries have also denied the accusation during the investigation. It is further submitted that from the F.I.R. it does not appear that any verification of the record has been done before the lodging the F.I.R. and the P.D.S. dealership of the petitioner has been suspended. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing the bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hilsa, Nalanda in connection with Aungari P.S. Case No. 27/2011 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) Amrendra Kumar/-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial