Jagdish Bhuiyan Vs. the State of Bihar

Jagdish Bhuiyan vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 12, 2012

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/974702

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/974702
Court: Patna High Court
Decided On: May 12, 2012
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Jagdish Bhuiyan

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.863 of 2012 ====================================================== jagdish bhuiyan .... .... petitioner versus the state of bihar .... .... opposite party =====================================================”12. 01-2012 heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the state. the petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under section 47(a) of the excise act. 20 kgs of mahua and 5 liters of country made liquor has been recovered. it appears that seizure was made on 21.01.2011 whereas the prosecution report was transmitted to the learned court below on 17.02.2011. considering the quantity of the seizure and the delayed transmission of the prosecution report which cloud the bona fide of the accusation, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing the bail bond of rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned chief judicial magistrate, aurangabad in connection with kuttumba p.s./excise case no. 16/2011 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the cr.p.c. (dinesh kumar singh, j) amrendra kumar/-

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.863 of 2012 ====================================================== Jagdish Bhuiyan .... .... Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party =====================================================”

12. 01-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 47(A) of the Excise Act. 20 Kgs of Mahua and 5 liters of country made liquor has been recovered. It appears that seizure was made on 21.01.2011 whereas the prosecution report was transmitted to the learned court below on 17.02.2011. Considering the quantity of the seizure and the delayed transmission of the prosecution report which cloud the bona fide of the accusation, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing the bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in connection with Kuttumba P.S./Excise Case No. 16/2011 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) Amrendra Kumar/-

Same Court & Year Patna · 2012 Same Parties Jagdish Bhuiyan vs The State of Bihar Same Subject Education