Vijay Kumar Rai Vs. the State of Bihar and ors

in the high court of judicature at patna civil writ jurisdiction case no.739 of 2012 vijay kumar rai s/o shri uday narayan rai resident of village chailwa, p.o. & police station gopalpur, district gopalganj..petitioner versus 1. the state of bihar 2. the principal secretary, human resources development department, bihar, patna 3. the director (primary education), govt. of bihar, patna 4. the district magistrate, gopalganj 5. the district education officer, gopalganj 6. the district programme officer (establishment) gopalganj 7. the block education extension officer kuchaikot, district-gopalganj.8. the mukhiya, gram panchayat raj sangwadih, block-kuchaikot, district- gopalganj 9. the panchayat secretary, gram panchayat raj sangwadih, block-kuchaikot, district gopalganj...respondents -------”12. 01.2012 heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the state. the grievance of the petitioner is that though the order of the appellate authority dated 13.09.2009, a copy whereof is annexure-4 with the writ application, is entirely in favour of the petitioner with specific direction for his appointment, respondent nos.8 and 9 have not complied with the said order and petitioner has not been appointed till now. 2 this writ application is, accordingly, disposed of with direction to the concerned respondents that, if the said order of the appellate authority is not under challenge before any higher authority or has not been reviewed or is under dispute at any level till now, they must comply with the said order and issue appointment letter to the petitioner positively within two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. however, in case it is found that the said order of the appellate authority has been rescinded or reviewed or is under dispute at any level, the same shall also be communicated to the petitioner so that he may take appropriate steps. (j.n. singh, j.) bt