Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Meena Devi Vs. the State of Bihar

Meena Devi vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 12, 2012
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/974673

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Meena Devi

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.44728 of 2011 meena devi, w/o-satya narayan ram versus the state of bihar ---------------------------------”12. 01.2012 heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned additional public prosecutor for the state. petitioner is elder gotini of the deceased and is languishing in jail custody since 24.10.2011 in a case registered under sections 302/34 of the indian penal code. allegedly, the husband of the deceased had illicit relationship with petitioner and on account of the aforesaid illicit relationship petitioner and other accused allegedly, committed the murder of the deceased but admittedly, none has seen the actual killing of the deceased and only suspicion has been raised against the petitioner. considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of chief judicial magistrate, rohtas at sasaram in connection with rohtas p.s. case no. 150 of 2011. shahzad ( hemant kumar srivastava, j.)

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.44728 of 2011 Meena Devi, W/O-Satya Narayan Ram Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------”

12. 01.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is elder gotini of the deceased and is languishing in jail custody since 24.10.2011 in a case registered under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegedly, the husband of the deceased had illicit relationship with petitioner and on account of the aforesaid illicit relationship petitioner and other accused allegedly, committed the murder of the deceased but admittedly, none has seen the actual killing of the deceased and only suspicion has been raised against the petitioner. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Rohtas P.S. Case No. 150 of 2011. SHAHZAD ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial