Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Pradeep Sharma and anr. Vs. the State of Bihar

Pradeep Sharma and anr. vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 12, 2012
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/974667

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Pradeep Sharma and anr.

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.42976 o”1. pradeep sharma shyam narayan sharma r/o,vill.- kudra,p.s.-kudra,p.s.-kudra,dist.-kaimur 2. pappu sharma shyam narayan sharma r/o,vill.-kudra,p.s.- kudra,p.s.-kudra,dist.-kaimur versus the state of bihar ---------------------------------- 02. 12.01.2012 heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the state and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant. the petitioners are in custody in connection with kudra p.s. case no. 187 of 2011 for offence punishable under sections 323, 324, 341, 307/34 of the indian penal code and section 27 of the arms act. whereas the petitioner no. 1 pradeep sharma has been charged with assaulting the informant by means of a sword, the petitioner no. 2 pappu sharma has been charged with firing at the informant by a revolver. the injury report placed as annexure-2 supports the allegations made. no case for grant of indulgence is made out. the prayer is refused. the application is dismissed. (jyoti saran, j.) s.sb/-

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.42976 o”

1. Pradeep Sharma Shyam Narayan Sharma R/O,Vill.- Kudra,P.S.-Kudra,P.S.-Kudra,Dist.-Kaimur 2. Pappu Sharma Shyam Narayan Sharma R/O,Vill.-Kudra,P.S.- Kudra,P.S.-Kudra,Dist.-Kaimur Versus The State of Bihar ---------------------------------- 02. 12.01.2012 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant. The petitioners are in custody in connection with Kudra P.S. Case No. 187 of 2011 for offence punishable under Sections 323, 324, 341, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Whereas the petitioner no. 1 Pradeep Sharma has been charged with assaulting the informant by means of a sword, the petitioner no. 2 Pappu Sharma has been charged with firing at the informant by a revolver. The injury report placed as Annexure-2 supports the allegations made. No case for grant of indulgence is made out. The prayer is refused. The application is dismissed. (Jyoti Saran, J.) S.Sb/-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial