Pintu Rai Vs. the State of Bihar

Pintu Rai vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 12, 2012

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/974642

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/974642
Court: Patna High Court
Decided On: May 12, 2012
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Pintu Rai

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.963 of 2012 pintu rai versus the state of bihar 2. 12.01.2012. heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the state. the petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under sections 186, 189, 353/34 of the indian penal code and 3(1)(x) of s.c./s.t. (prevention of atrocities)act. it is alleged that informant being the police officer was checking the vehicles when this petitioner misbehaved and abused by calling caste name. it is submitted by learned senior counsel for the petitioner that there was public complaint against the police officer prior to lodging of present case and that was the reason that supervising officer has not found accusation true under s.c./s.t.(prevention of atrocities)act in the present case. considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below 2 within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with behea p.s. case no. 180 of 2011 on furnishing bail bond of rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned c.j.m. bhojpur at ara, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the code of criminal procedure. u. k. ( dinesh kumar singh, j)

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.963 of 2012 Pintu Rai Versus The State Of Bihar 2. 12.01.2012. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 186, 189, 353/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 3(1)(x) of S.C./S.T. (Prevention of Atrocities)Act. It is alleged that informant being the police officer was checking the vehicles when this petitioner misbehaved and abused by calling caste name. It is submitted by learned senior counsel for the petitioner that there was public complaint against the police officer prior to lodging of present case and that was the reason that supervising officer has not found accusation true under S.C./S.T.(Prevention of Atrocities)Act in the present case. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below 2 within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Behea P.S. Case No. 180 of 2011 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Bhojpur at Ara, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

Same Court & Year Patna · 2012 Same Parties Pintu Rai vs The State of Bihar Same Subject Education