Rameshwar Mishra and ors Vs. the State of Bihar and ors

Rameshwar Mishra and ors vs The State of Bihar and ors

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 12, 2012

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/974638

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/974638
Court: Patna High Court
Decided On: May 12, 2012
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rameshwar Mishra and ors

Respondent

The State of Bihar and ors

Excerpt

.....education department, government of bihar, patna2. the principal secretary, education department, government of bihar, patna3. the director, primary education, government of bihar, patna4. the regional deputy director of education, patna division, patna5. the district superintendent of education cum district education officer, rohtas respondents ---------------------------------- for the petitioners : mr.sunil kumar, adv. for the state : md.shahab khalil, a.c. to s.c.3 ----------------------------------2. 12/01/2012 learned counsel for the petitioners points out that in identical circumstances, some of the teachers had moved this court through c.w.j.c.no.14835 of 2006. the said writ application was disposed of by order 2 dated 13.7.2011, copy whereof is annexure-9 to the writ application. he submits that this writ application may also be disposed of in the same terms. learned counsel for the state agrees to the said prayer of the petitioners. hence, this writ application is disposed of in terms of the said order referred to above, as contained in annexure- 9, and it is held that the said order will be deemed to have been passed in the case of the present petitioners also. pradeep/ ( j.n. singh,j.)

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.583 o”

1. Rameshwar Mishra Son Of Late Mathura Mishra Resident Of Village - Madhukarpur, Post - Basudeo Dihri, P.S. Dinara, District - Rohtas

2. Lalan Prasad Sharma Son Of Late Braj Narayan Sharma Resident Of Village + P.O. Khuduru, P.S. Dinara, District - Rohtas

3. Nand Lal Singh Son Of Dideshi Singh Resident Of Village - Bhagirtha, Post Khudru, P.S. Dinara, District - Rohtas

4. Shri Bhagwan Singh Son Of Late Loknath Singh Resident Of Village -Rehi, P.O. Bhanpur, P.S. Dinara, District - Rohtas

5. Krishna Bihari Singh Son Of Ram Chandra Singh Resident Of Village + P.O. Gosaldih, P.S. Suryapura, District - Rohtas

6. Ram Pravesh Singh Son Of Late Bishnu Singh Resident Of Village + P.O. Gosaldih, P.S. Suryapura, District - Rohtas

7. Jeet Narayan Singh Son Of Late Ram Pujan Singh Resident Of Village - Semri, P.S. Karahga, District - Rohtas Petitioners Versus

1. The State Of Bihar , Through The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government Of Bihar, Patna

2. The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government Of Bihar, Patna

3. The Director, Primary Education, Government Of Bihar, Patna

4. The Regional Deputy Director Of Education, Patna Division, Patna

5. The District Superintendent Of Education Cum District Education Officer, Rohtas Respondents ---------------------------------- For the Petitioners : Mr.Sunil Kumar, Adv. For the State : Md.Shahab Khalil, A.C. to S.C.3 ----------------------------------

2. 12/01/2012 Learned counsel for the petitioners points out that in identical circumstances, some of the teachers had moved this Court through C.W.J.C.No.14835 of 2006. The said writ application was disposed of by order 2 dated 13.7.2011, copy whereof is Annexure-9 to the writ application. He submits that this writ application may also be disposed of in the same terms. Learned counsel for the State agrees to the said prayer of the petitioners. Hence, this writ application is disposed of in terms of the said order referred to above, as contained in Annexure- 9, and it is held that the said order will be deemed to have been passed in the case of the present petitioners also. Pradeep/ ( J.

N. Singh,J.)

Same Court & Year Patna · 2012 Same Parties Rameshwar Mishra and ors vs The State of Bihar and ors Same Subject Education