Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Runka Devi @ Runki Devi Vs. the State of Bihar

Runka Devi @ Runki Devi vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 12, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/974636

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Runka Devi @ Runki Devi

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.855 of 2012 ====================================================== runka devi @ runki devi .... .... petitioner/s versus the state of bihar .... .... opposite party/s =====================================================”12. 01-2012 heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the state. the petitioner being the mother of the husband is apprehending her arrest in a case registered under sections 302, 328 and 201/34 of the indian penal code. it is alleged that for the dispute of some money with regard to indira awas scheme, the victim was administered poison. it is alleged against the husband of the victim that he threw the dead body of the victim on the road. it is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that nothing specifically alleged against this petitioner and the charge sheet has been submitted under section 306/34 of the indian penal code. considering the fact that the accusation was not found true under section 302 ipc and nothing specifically alleged against this petitioner, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail in the event of her arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing the bail bond of rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned chief judicial magistrate, supaul in connection with kishanpur p.s. case no. 89/2011 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the cr.p.c. (dinesh kumar singh, j) amrendra kumar/-

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.855 of 2012 ====================================================== Runka Devi @ Runki Devi .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s =====================================================”

12. 01-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioner being the mother of the husband is apprehending her arrest in a case registered under Sections 302, 328 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged that for the dispute of some money with regard to Indira Awas Scheme, the victim was administered poison. It is alleged against the husband of the victim that he threw the dead body of the victim on the road. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that nothing specifically alleged against this petitioner and the charge sheet has been submitted under Section 306/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering the fact that the accusation was not found true under Section 302 IPC and nothing specifically alleged against this petitioner, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail in the event of her arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing the bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul in connection with Kishanpur P.S. Case No. 89/2011 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) Amrendra Kumar/-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial