Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Batukeshwar Pandey Vs. the State of Bihar and ors

Batukeshwar Pandey vs The State of Bihar and ors

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 12, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/974618

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Batukeshwar Pandey

Respondent

The State of Bihar and ors

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna civil writ jurisdiction case no.734 of 2012 batukeshwar pandey, aged about 6 years, s/o late musafir pandey, r/o mohalla sevadal road, champatgali, p.s.-civil line, district-gaya. petitioner. versus 1. the state of bihar through the secretary, human resources development department, government of bihar, patna.2. the director, human resources development department, government of bihar, patna.3. the regional deputy director of education, magadh division, district-gaya.4. the district superintendent of education, gaya, district-gaya. respondents. ---------------------------------”12. 01.2012 petitioners wife died in harness on 29.07.2007. grievance of the petitioner is that she had became entitled for benefits of the acp scheme with effect from 09.08.1999 and 09.08.2001, but the same has not been calculated and paid. hence, a prayer is made for a direction to the respondents to calculate the said benefits of the deceased wife of the petitioner and pay the same. this writ application is accordingly disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before the director, human resources development department, government of bihar, patna for the purpose, who shall consider his 2 representation, get the entitlement of the deceased wife of the petitioner examined in terms of the scheme and pass appropriate orders in respect of the same with orders for release of the admitted benefits positively within two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. arvind/ ( j.n. singh, j.)

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.734 of 2012 BATUKESHWAR PANDEY, AGED ABOUT 6 YEARS, S/O LATE MUSAFIR PANDEY, R/O MOHALLA SEVADAL ROAD, CHAMPATGALI, P.S.-CIVIL LINE, DISTRICT-GAYA. PETITIONER. Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA.

2. THE DIRECTOR, HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA.

3. THE REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, MAGADH DIVISION, DISTRICT-GAYA.

4. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, GAYA, DISTRICT-GAYA. RESPONDENTS. ---------------------------------”

12. 01.2012 Petitioners wife died in harness on 29.07.2007. Grievance of the petitioner is that she had became entitled for benefits of the ACP Scheme with effect from 09.08.1999 and 09.08.2001, but the same has not been calculated and paid. Hence, a prayer is made for a direction to the respondents to calculate the said benefits of the deceased wife of the petitioner and pay the same. This writ application is accordingly disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before the Director, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna for the purpose, who shall consider his 2 representation, get the entitlement of the deceased wife of the petitioner examined in terms of the Scheme and pass appropriate orders in respect of the same with orders for release of the admitted benefits positively within two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. Arvind/ ( J.N. Singh, J.)

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial