Alok Kumar Vs. the State of Bihar and ors

Alok Kumar vs The State of Bihar and ors

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 12, 2012

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/974611

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/974611
Court: Patna High Court
Decided On: May 12, 2012
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Alok Kumar

Respondent

The State of Bihar and ors

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna civil writ jurisdiction case no.4652 of 2008 alok kumar, son of laxmi narayan singh, resident of village krishn nagar, p.o. sain, p.s. belsar op, block paterhi belsar, district vaishali at hajipur petitioner versus 1. the state of bihar 2. the district magistrate vaishali at hajipur 3. the deputy development commissioner vaishali at hajipur 4. the district education officer, vaishali at hajipur 5. the district superintendent of education, vaishali at hajipur 6. the block development officer paterhi belsar district vaishali at hajipur 7. the block education extension officer paterhi belsar district vaishali at hajipur 8. the mukhiya gram panchayat sain, block paterhi belsar, district vaishali at hajipur 9. the panchayat secretary gram panchayat sain block paterhi belsar, district vaishali at hajipur 10. raj kishor pandit, son of parmeshwar pandit, resident of village p.o. and gram panchayat saien, p.s. paterhi belsar, op block paterhi belsar, district vaishali at hajipur respondents ---------------------------------- 3. 12.1.2012 having heard counsel for the parties and taking into account that the petitioners grievance against appointment of respondent no.10 on the post of panchayat shiksha mitra, can be looked into by the district teachers appellate authority for a limited purpose as to whether the appointment of respondent no.10 was correct, inasmuch as the petitioners appointment on the basis of a panel of shiksha mitra is now no longer permissible. in that view of the matter if the petitioner approaches the district teachers appellate authority assailing the appointment of respondent no.10 on the post of shiksha mitra and eventual absorption on the post of panchayat teacher, the authority shall examine the matter and take its decision in accordance with law but only after giving opportunity of hearing both to the petitioner and respondent no.10. 2 with the aforementioned observation and direction, this application is disp

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4652 of 2008 Alok Kumar, son of Laxmi Narayan Singh, resident of village Krishn Nagar, P.O. Sain, P.S. Belsar OP, Block Paterhi Belsar, District Vaishali at Hajipur Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The District Magistrate Vaishali at Hajipur 3. The Deputy Development Commissioner Vaishali at Hajipur 4. The District Education Officer, Vaishali at Hajipur 5. The District Superintendent of Education, Vaishali at Hajipur 6. The Block Development Officer Paterhi Belsar District Vaishali at Hajipur 7. The Block Education Extension Officer Paterhi Belsar District Vaishali at Hajipur 8. The Mukhiya Gram Panchayat Sain, Block Paterhi Belsar, District Vaishali at Hajipur 9. The Panchayat Secretary Gram Panchayat Sain Block Paterhi Belsar, District Vaishali at Hajipur 10. Raj Kishor Pandit, son of Parmeshwar Pandit, resident of village P.O. and Gram Panchayat Saien, P.S. Paterhi Belsar, OP Block Paterhi Belsar, District Vaishali at Hajipur Respondents ---------------------------------- 3. 12.1.2012 Having heard counsel for the parties and taking into account that the petitioners grievance against appointment of respondent no.10 on the post of Panchayat Shiksha Mitra, can be looked into by the District Teachers Appellate Authority for a limited purpose as to whether the appointment of respondent no.10 was correct, inasmuch as the petitioners appointment on the basis of a panel of Shiksha Mitra is now no longer permissible. In that view of the matter if the petitioner approaches the District Teachers Appellate Authority assailing the appointment of respondent no.10 on the post of Shiksha Mitra and eventual absorption on the post of Panchayat teacher, the Authority shall examine the matter and take its decision in accordance with law but only after giving opportunity of hearing both to the petitioner and respondent no.10. 2 With the aforementioned observation and direction, this application is disposed of. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/

Same Court & Year Patna · 2012 Same Parties Alok Kumar vs The State of Bihar and ors Same Subject Education