Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Safi Alam and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar

Safi Alam and ors. vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 12, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/974601

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Safi Alam and ors.

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.854 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. safi alam 2. makshood alam 3. shakir hussain.4. damari mian 5. md. haroon 6. md. meraj @ reyaz alam 7. md. mumtaz .... .... petitioner/s versus the state of bihar .... .... opposite party/s =====================================================”12. 01-2012 heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the state. the petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under sections 147, 148, 149, 332, 353 and 504 of the indian penal code. it is alleged that 30-35 persons including the petitioners entered into the campus of the police station and scuffled with the police personnel. it is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the mob was protesting against highhandedness of the police when no injury was caused to anyone. considering the general accusation against the mob, let the above named petitioners be released on anticipatory bail in the event of her arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing the bail bond of rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned chief judicial magistrate, gopalganj in connection with uchkagaon p.s. case no. 195/2011 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the cr.p.c. (dinesh kumar singh, j) amrendra kumar/-

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.854 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Safi Alam 2. Makshood Alam 3. Shakir Hussain.

4. Damari Mian 5. Md. Haroon 6. Md. Meraj @ Reyaz Alam 7. Md. Mumtaz .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s =====================================================”

12. 01-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 332, 353 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged that 30-35 persons including the petitioners entered into the campus of the police station and scuffled with the police personnel. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the mob was protesting against highhandedness of the police when no injury was caused to anyone. Considering the general accusation against the mob, let the above named petitioners be released on anticipatory bail in the event of her arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing the bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj in connection with Uchkagaon P.S. Case No. 195/2011 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) Amrendra Kumar/-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial