Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sanjay Kumar Vs. the State of Bihar and ors

Sanjay Kumar vs The State of Bihar and ors

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 12, 2012
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/974600

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sanjay Kumar

Respondent

The State of Bihar and ors

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.22819 of 2011 sanjay kumar versus the state of bihar & ors ---------------------------------”12. 01.2012 sri sravan kumar, learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that for implementing the impugned order the opposite party no. 2 to 4 had earlier approached this court while invoking its writ jurisdiction vide cr. w.j.c. 1127 of 2011 without impleading the petitioner as party and this court by order dated 09.12.2011 has disposed of the same with certain observation. sri shravan kumar, learned senior counsel further submits that in cr.w.j.c. no. 1127 of 2011 the petitioner of the present case has filed a petition for modification of order dated 09.12.2011 vide token no. cr. misc. no. 1357 of 2012. accordingly, it would be appropriate to hear the present case after disposal of the modification petition which was filed on 09th january, 2012 vide token no. cr. misc. 1357 of 2012. the submission by learned counsel for the petitioner has been made in presence of sri parmanand prasad, learned additional public prosecutor and sri rajeev ranjan no. 2, who appears on behalf of opposite party no. 2 to 4. ( rakesh kumar, j.) praful

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.22819 of 2011 Sanjay Kumar Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors ---------------------------------”

12. 01.2012 Sri Sravan Kumar, learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that for implementing the impugned order the opposite party no. 2 to 4 had earlier approached this court while invoking its writ jurisdiction vide Cr. W.J.C. 1127 of 2011 without impleading the petitioner as party and this court by order dated 09.12.2011 has disposed of the same with certain observation. Sri Shravan Kumar, learned senior counsel further submits that in Cr.W.J.C. No. 1127 of 2011 the petitioner of the present case has filed a petition for modification of order dated 09.12.2011 vide token no. Cr. Misc. No. 1357 of 2012. Accordingly, it would be appropriate to hear the present case after disposal of the modification petition which was filed on 09th January, 2012 vide token no. Cr. Misc. 1357 of 2012. The submission by learned counsel for the petitioner has been made in presence of Sri Parmanand Prasad, learned Additional Public Prosecutor and Sri Rajeev Ranjan No. 2, who appears on behalf of opposite party no. 2 to 4. ( Rakesh Kumar, J.) Praful

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial