Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Lalan Singh Vs. the State of Bihar and ors

Lalan Singh vs The State of Bihar and ors

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 12, 2012
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/974599

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Lalan Singh

Respondent

The State of Bihar and ors

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna civil writ jurisdiction case no.5488 of 2008 lalan singh versus the state of bihar & ors. --------”12. 01.2012 heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the state. no one appears on behalf of the lalit narayan mithila university. this court by order dated 16.4.2008 had directed the counsel for the university to file a comprehensive counter affidavit, wherein, it was also asked to explain the case of jai nath jha and amar nath jha as stated by the petitioner in paragraph nos. 19 & 20 of the writ application. despite expiry of a period of four years, no counter affidavit has been filed by the university. in that view of the matter, this court would direct for personal appearance of the registrar of the lalit narayan mithila university to explain as to why he should not be punished for committing contempt of this court. list this case on 2.2.2012 when the registrar of the university must remain 2 personally present. let a copy of this order be sent to the registrar of the lalit narayan mithila university for its strict compliance. (mihir kumar jha, j.) rsh

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5488 of 2008 Lalan Singh Versus The State of Bihar & Ors. --------”

12. 01.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State. No one appears on behalf of the Lalit Narayan Mithila University. This Court by order dated 16.4.2008 had directed the counsel for the University to file a comprehensive counter affidavit, wherein, it was also asked to explain the case of Jai Nath Jha and Amar Nath Jha as stated by the petitioner in paragraph nos. 19 & 20 of the writ application. Despite expiry of a period of four years, no counter affidavit has been filed by the University. In that view of the matter, this Court would direct for personal appearance of the Registrar of the Lalit Narayan Mithila University to explain as to why he should not be punished for committing contempt of this Court. List this case on 2.2.2012 when the Registrar of the University must remain 2 personally present. Let a copy of this order be sent to the Registrar of the Lalit Narayan Mithila University for its strict compliance. (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.) Rsh

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial