Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Vijendra Kumar Vs. the State of Bihar and ors

Vijendra Kumar vs The State of Bihar and ors

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 12, 2012
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/974594

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Vijendra Kumar

Respondent

The State of Bihar and ors

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna civil writ jurisdiction case no.83 of 2012 vijendra kumar son of kamlesh prasad resident of village-naya tola, dariyapur, p.o. + p.s.- dariyapur, district-munger .. petitioner versus 1. the state of bihar 2. the principal secretary, department of human resources development, government of bihar, patna 3. the director, primary education, government of bihar, patna 4. the regional deputy director of education, munger 5. the district education officer, munger 6. the district board, munger through its chief executive officer 7. the chief executive officer, district board, munger 8. the headmaster, lal bahadur shastri kisan high school, mamai, munger . respondents ---------------------------------- 3. 12/01/2012 petitioner is aggrieved by the order of the district education officer dated 23.10.2007, as contained in annexure-3, by which, on account of discrepancy in his certificate and mark sheet, his appointment as panchayat teacher has been cancelled. petitioner has statutory remedy available to him before the appellate authority constituted under the rules. the writ application is, therefore, disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to move the concerned appellate authority in accordance with law. pradeep/ ( j.n. singh,j.)

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.83 of 2012 Vijendra Kumar Son Of Kamlesh Prasad Resident Of Village-Naya Tola, Dariyapur, P.O. + P.S.- Dariyapur, District-Munger .. Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Principal Secretary, Department Of Human Resources Development, Government Of Bihar, Patna 3. The Director, Primary Education, Government Of Bihar, Patna 4. The Regional Deputy Director Of Education, Munger 5. The District Education Officer, Munger 6. The District Board, Munger Through Its Chief Executive Officer 7. The Chief Executive Officer, District Board, Munger 8. The Headmaster, Lal Bahadur Shastri Kisan High School, Mamai, Munger . Respondents ---------------------------------- 3. 12/01/2012 Petitioner is aggrieved by the order of the District Education Officer dated 23.10.2007, as contained in Annexure-3, by which, on account of discrepancy in his certificate and mark sheet, his appointment as Panchayat Teacher has been cancelled. Petitioner has statutory remedy available to him before the Appellate Authority constituted under the Rules. The writ application is, therefore, disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to move the concerned Appellate Authority in accordance with law. Pradeep/ ( J.

N. Singh,J.)

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial