Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ram Babu Prasad Vs. the State of Bihar and ors

Ram Babu Prasad vs The State of Bihar and ors

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 12, 2012
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/974593

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ram Babu Prasad

Respondent

The State of Bihar and ors

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna miscellaneous jurisdiction case no.358 of 2009 enamul haque versus the state of bihar & ors ---------------------------------- with miscellaneous jurisdiction case no.4352 of 2009 maya nand ram versus the state of bihar & ors ---------------------------------- with miscellaneous jurisdiction case no.4354 of 2009 ram babu prasad versus the state of bihar & ors ---------------------------------- 4. 12.01.2012 the petitioners seek initiation of contempt against the opposite parties for non-compliance of the order dated 26.2.2008 passed in c.w.j.c. nos. 6022 of 2007, 13453 of 2006 and 7442 of 2006 respectively. it has been submitted that the representations could not be considered on account of the fact that it was without authentication of the college authorities. the counsel for the petitioners seek two weeks indulgence for filing a representation duly authenticated by the college authorities which shall be considered within next three weeks of its filing by the university. put up after five weeks retaining its position. ( anjana prakash, j.) s.ali

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.358 of 2009 Enamul Haque Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors ---------------------------------- with Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4352 of 2009 Maya Nand Ram Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors ---------------------------------- with Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4354 of 2009 Ram Babu Prasad Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors ---------------------------------- 4. 12.01.2012 The petitioners seek initiation of contempt against the Opposite Parties for non-compliance of the order dated 26.2.2008 passed in C.W.J.C. Nos. 6022 of 2007, 13453 of 2006 and 7442 of 2006 respectively. It has been submitted that the representations could not be considered on account of the fact that it was without authentication of the College authorities. The counsel for the petitioners seek two weeks indulgence for filing a representation duly authenticated by the College authorities which shall be considered within next three weeks of its filing by the University. Put up after five weeks retaining its position. ( Anjana Prakash, J.) S.Ali

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial