Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ramashish Chaubey Vs. the State of Bihar and ors

Ramashish Chaubey vs The State of Bihar and ors

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 12, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/974566

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ramashish Chaubey

Respondent

The State of Bihar and ors

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna civil writ jurisdiction case no.11471 of 2007 ramashish chaubey, son of late satyaarayan chaubey, resident of village tarkulwa, p.s. chautarwa, district west champaran petitioner versus 1. the state of bihar 2. the collector, west champaran, bettiah 3. the sub divisional officer, bagaha, west champaran 4. the district supply officer, west champaran, bettiah 5. the block supply officer, bagaha 1, west champaran .. respondents for the petitioner : mr. umesh chandra verma, advocate for the state : mr. dhirendra kr. jha, ac to sc 1.2 12.01.2012 heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the state. it is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that his licence was suspended as back as on 25.1.2005 and thereafter he has given representation to the sub divisional officer, bagaha, district west champaran for revocation of the same but as no order was passed by him, he has approached this court in the year 2007. however, none of the parties is in a position to say as to whether any order has been passed by the authorities or not during the pendency of this writ application either revoking the 2 suspension or taking a final decision regarding cancellation of the licence of the petitioner for which a notice was given to him vide annexure 1. no counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the state despite of the fact that the writ application had been filed as back as in year 2007. in above view of the matter, this writ application is being disposed of with a direction to the sub divisional officer, bagaha, west champaran to dispose of the application filed on behalf of the petitioner on 7.2.2005, a copy of which has been appended as annexure 2, if any final order has already not been passed, within three weeks from the date of receipt / production of a certified copy of this order. spd/- ( dr. ravi ranjan, j.)

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11471 of 2007 Ramashish Chaubey, Son of Late Satyaarayan Chaubey, resident of village Tarkulwa, P.S. Chautarwa, District West Champaran Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Collector, West Champaran, Bettiah 3. The Sub Divisional Officer, Bagaha, West Champaran 4. The District Supply Officer, West Champaran, Bettiah 5. The Block Supply Officer, Bagaha 1, West Champaran .. Respondents For the Petitioner : Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma, Advocate For the State : Mr. Dhirendra Kr. Jha, AC to SC 1.2 12.01.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that his licence was suspended as back as on 25.1.2005 and thereafter he has given representation to the Sub Divisional Officer, Bagaha, District West Champaran for revocation of the same but as no order was passed by him, he has approached this Court in the year 2007. However, none of the parties is in a position to say as to whether any order has been passed by the authorities or not during the pendency of this writ application either revoking the 2 suspension or taking a final decision regarding cancellation of the licence of the petitioner for which a notice was given to him vide Annexure 1. No counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the State despite of the fact that the writ application had been filed as back as in year 2007. In above view of the matter, this writ application is being disposed of with a direction to the Sub Divisional Officer, Bagaha, West Champaran to dispose of the application filed on behalf of the petitioner on 7.2.2005, a copy of which has been appended as Annexure 2, if any final order has already not been passed, within three weeks from the date of receipt / production of a certified copy of this order. Spd/- ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial